Resource Library

Topics

Filters

Resource Library

New to the Resource Library?

Learn how to navigate, search, and use our resources effectively.

How to use the Library

Brief of Center on Children & the Law; Center on Juvenile & Criminal Justice; Children & Family Justice Center; and Juvenile Justice Project of Louisiana et al. as Amici Curiae in Support of Lionel Tate, Appellant

This brief argues for reversing a lower court's ruling. It claims the court failed to consider Lionel's age and violated his constitutional rights, including due process and protection against cruel and unusual punishment.

infancy defensechildrencapacy to commit a crimetransfers to criminal courtdue processFourteenth Amendment (U.S.)equal protectionlife without the possibility of paroleLWOPcompetenceEighth Amendment (U.S.)
(2002)

Gonzalez v. Cecil County, Maryland

The court allowed a widow's lawsuit against Cecil County and jail staff to proceed. She claimed they were deliberately indifferent to her husband's fatal heroin withdrawal.

jail staffuntreated heroin withdrawaldeliberate indifference
(2002)

MX Group, Inc. v. City of Covington

The Sixth Circuit ruled Covington discriminated against people with disabilities by denying a permit for a methadone clinic and changing zoning laws. This decision favored MX Group, who had sued the city.

Methadone clinicADARehab ActZoning lawsDiscrimination
(2002)

State v. Weaver

The South Dakota Supreme Court allowed expert testimony on battered woman's syndrome and the cycle of violence. This helps explain why victims might recant statements or return to abusive partners.

battered woman's syndromecycle of violencedomestic abuseexpert testimonyabuseintimate partner violencepsychological effects of abusedomestic violence awareness
(2002)

Fairfax County Fire & Rescue Department v. Mottram

The Court ruled a firefighter's PTSD was an occupational disease. Repeated traumatic work exposures caused neurobiological changes, making his condition eligible for workers' comp.

firefighter PTSDoccupational diseaseworkers comptraumatic emergency eventsneurobiological changeswork-related PTSDemergency responder mental healthfirst responder
(2002)

Bernal v. People

The Colorado Supreme Court found a photo array was too suggestive due to the defendant's distinct ethnicity and background. The case was sent back to determine if eyewitness identifications were still reliable.

photo arrayimpermissibly suggestiveethnicityeyewitness identificationsreliable
(2002)

Criminal decision making: The development of adolescent judgment, criminal responsibility, and culpability

The juvenile justice system has shifted towards more punitive measures, treating adolescents similarly to adults. This raises questions about adolescent maturity and decision-making in criminal contexts.

psychosocial factorstemporal perspectivepeer influencerisk perceptionadolescent criminal decision-making
(2001)

State v. Peralto

The Hawaii Supreme Court ruled that a life without parole sentence for murder was cruel and unusual for a defendant with mental retardation. The court found mental limitations reduced culpability, making the sentence disproportionate.

LWOPjuvenile life without parolemental disabilitiesEighth Amendment (U.S.)cruel and unusual punishmentconsecutive life sentences
(2001)

Youth Law Center Brief in Support of Petitioners

This brief argues that Proposition 21 harms public safety by increasing youth recidivism and injury. It also contends that the law's lack of prosecutorial guidelines worsens racial disparities in the justice system.

transferstransfer to adult courtjuvenilespublic safetyharmyouthyouth of colorracial disparities
(2001)

Bustamante v. Massanari

The Ninth Circuit ruled that judges must assess all impairments, including drug or alcohol addiction, together when evaluating disability claims. Only then can they determine if substance abuse is material.

disability claimsdrug addictionalcoholism
(2001)

In re Anthony W.

The court committed a minor to juvenile hall due to repeated drug use and probation violations. This decision prioritized rehabilitation and supervision for the minor.

uvenile detentiondrug useprobation violationrehabilitation
(2001)

Florida Cannabis Action Network, Inc. v. City of Jacksonville

The court blocked Jacksonville's cannabis-festival ordinance, finding it likely violated First Amendment speech rights and unlawfully regulated event content.

cannabis festivalfree speechcontent regulationpreliminary injunction
(2001)

Lopez v. Davis

The Court upheld a federal regulation excluding inmates convicted of drug or firearm offenses from early release. This affirmed the Bureau of Prisons' discretion in inmate program eligibility.

federal regulationinmatesdrug offensesfirearm offensesearly releasediscretion
(2001)

United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers’ Coop.

The Supreme Court ruled there is no medical necessity exception to the Controlled Substances Act. This means organizations cannot distribute marijuana, even for sick patients under state law.

Controlled Substances Actmedical necessity exceptionmedical marijuanapatient rights
(2001)

Ferguson v. Charleston

The Supreme Court ruled that drug testing pregnant women without consent for law enforcement purposes violated the Fourth Amendment. This case balanced public health concerns with individual privacy rights.

drug testingpregnant womenconsentpublic healthprivacy rightslaw enforcement
(2001)