Gonzalez v. Cecil County, Maryland
SimpleOriginal

Summary

Jose Gonzalez’s widow sued Cecil County and jail staff under §1983 after he died from untreated heroin withdrawal. State claims were dismissed for lack of notice, but federal deliberate indifference claims were allowed to proceed.

2002 | Federal Juristiction

Gonzalez v. Cecil County, Maryland

Keywords jail staff; untreated heroin withdrawal; deliberate indifference
Open Case as PDF

Summary

The surviving spouse of Jose Gonzalez initiated legal action against Cecil County and its correctional facility personnel. This lawsuit, filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, followed Mr. Gonzalez's death, which was attributed to untreated heroin withdrawal. While state-level claims were dismissed due to insufficient notification, federal claims alleging deliberate indifference were permitted to proceed through the legal process.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

A lawsuit was filed against Cecil County and its jail staff by the widow of Jose Gonzalez. This legal action, brought under Section 1983 of federal law, alleged that Mr. Gonzalez died due to untreated heroin withdrawal while in custody. Claims made under state law were dismissed by the court because proper legal notice had not been provided. However, claims asserting deliberate indifference under federal law were allowed to proceed.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

The wife of Jose Gonzalez filed a lawsuit against Cecil County and its jail staff. This action was taken under a federal civil rights law, after Mr. Gonzalez died from complications of untreated heroin withdrawal. Claims made under state law were dismissed because the proper notification procedures were not followed. However, federal claims, which alleged that staff showed a deliberate disregard for his medical needs, were permitted to move forward in the legal process.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

Mr. Gonzalez's wife took Cecil County and jail workers to court. Her lawsuit came after Mr. Gonzalez died. He died because he was very sick from stopping heroin and did not get medical help. The court did not let some parts of her lawsuit continue because the county was not told about them in time. But other parts of her lawsuit could go forward. These parts said that jail staff purposefully ignored his need for medical care.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

221 F.Supp.2d 611 (2002)

Highlights