Resource Library

Topics

Filters

Resource Library

New to the Resource Library?

Learn how to navigate, search, and use our resources effectively.

How to use the Library

Brief of the Council of Juvenile Correctional Administrators as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner

This brief argues that a 12-year-old sentenced to 30 years without parole in adult court was an uninformed and unfortunate decision. It suggests the juvenile system should have retained jurisdiction.

transfersyoung offendersnegative outcomesrecidivismjuvenile courtsadult courtscapacity for rehabilitationcognitive abilitydevelopmental limitationsimmaturitydecision-makingadolescent delinquencydevelopmental deficiencies
(2008)

A Social Neuroscience Perspective on Adolescent Risk-taking

Adolescents face significant public health threats from preventable, self-inflicted risks like accidents and substance use.

Risk-takingAdolescenceChildhoodAdultsPubertyRewardsControlPeer influenceBrain Development
(2008)

Adolescent development and the regulation of youth crime

(2008)

In re Fabian A

Connecticut courts must explain plea consequences to juveniles in an age-appropriate way. This ensures they understand potential penalties and commitment extensions before pleading guilty.

(2008)

Patterson v. Board of Trustees, State Police Retirement System

The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled that severe mental injuries can qualify for accidental disability benefits, but only if caused by a terrifying event that threatened physical safety or involved death or serious injury.

permanent mental injurypsychological stressortraumatic eventaccidental disability benefitsmental injurydisability benefitsaccidental disability
(2008)

Council v. State

The South Carolina Supreme Court granted a new penalty hearing. The Court found counsel ineffective for failing to present mitigating evidence of the defendant's mental health issues and traumatic past.

postconviction reliefnew penalty hearingineffective counselmitigating evidenceschizophreniabrain dysfunctiontraumatic upbringing
(2008)

Allen v. Bloomfield Hills Sch. Dist.

The court ruled PTSD can be a bodily injury with objective medical evidence of brain changes. Expert testimony connecting trauma to brain abnormalities was enough to proceed.

PTSDbodily injurymedical evidencephysical injuryexpert testimonytrauma-related brain abnormalities
(2008)

Erickson v. Pardus

The Supreme Court ruled a prisoner's claim of denied life-saving medical treatment for hepatitis C deserved a full hearing. This reinforced inmates' right to challenge prison medical care under the Eighth Amendment.

Eighth Amendmentprisoner rightsmedical careprison medical carehepatitis Cinmate healthcarecruel and unusual punishmentlife-saving treatment
(2007)

Childhood Psychiatric Disorders and Young Adult Crime: A Prospective, Population-Based Study

A study found that young adults with a history of psychiatric disorders as children or adolescents were more likely to commit crimes. This link was especially strong for specific combinations of disorders.

childhood psychiatric disorderscriminal behavioryoung adult offendersat-risk childrenconduct disorderpsychopathologyearly intervention
(2007)

Malone v. State

The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals upheld a death sentence. It ruled that drug-induced psychosis did not meet the legal insanity threshold, despite evidence the defendant suffered from it.

capital punishmentlegal insanityinsanity defensemethamphetaminepsychosis
(2007)

Kimbrough v. US

The Supreme Court ruled that judges can consider the sentencing differences between crack and powder cocaine when applying advisory guidelines.

sentencingcrack cocainepowder cocainedisparitiesadvisory Guidelines
(2007)

Abdul-Kabir v. Quarterman

The Supreme Court overturned a death sentence because Texas jury instructions prevented full consideration of the defendant's troubled childhood and mental health. Jurors must be allowed to weigh all relevant mitigating evidence.

death penaltysentencingmitigating factors of youthAnti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act
(2007)

State v. Monteiro

Rhode Island's "Mario's Law" makes those sentenced before age 22 eligible for parole after 20 years. The State argues it excludes people with multiple consecutive sentences and violates separation of powers.

youth tried as adultsindividuals convicted of multiple sentencesMario’s Lawjuvenile justiceLWOPjuvenile life without paroleEighth Amendment (U.S.)proportionality principleconsecutive life sentencegang-related murder
(2007)

Brief of Juvenile Law Center and National Juvenile Defender Center as Amici Curiae in Support of the Defendant-Appellant

This brief argues that a jury should consider a 16-year-old defendant's age as a standalone factor when evaluating a duress defense. The lower court erred by limiting age's relevance to only a comparison with the coercers' ages.

adolescent vulnerabilitydecision-making ageduress defensepeer pressurecoercive situationsjury instructionsadolescent development
(2007)

Brief of Juvenile Law Center in support of Omar Khadr

Amici argue military commissions cannot prosecute minors due to absent jurisdiction rules and lack of distinct processes for youth. Federal law and science show adolescents differ from adults, making them less culpable.

developmental differencesenemy combatantdevelopmental psychologyrisky behaviorpeer pressurechild soldiersadolescent autonomydecision-makingfalse confessionsgreater capacity for changesocial science
(2007)