Malone v. Oklahoma
SimpleOriginal

Summary

In this 2007 case, the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals upheld a death sentence despite evidence the defendant suffered from methamphetamine-induced psychosis, ruling drug-induced mental illness did not meet legal insanity threshold.

2007 | State Juristiction

Malone v. Oklahoma

Keywords capital punishment; legal insanity; insanity defense; methamphetamine; psychosis
Open Case as PDF

Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals Decision (2007)

The 2007 Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals decision affirmed a death sentence. This occurred despite presented evidence indicating the defendant experienced methamphetamine-induced psychosis. The court determined that the defendant's drug-induced mental illness did not satisfy the legal criteria for the insanity defense.

Open Case as PDF

2007 Oklahoma Capital Case

The 2007 Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed a death sentence. This decision occurred despite presented evidence indicating the defendant experienced methamphetamine-induced psychosis. The court determined that drug-induced mental illness did not satisfy the legal criteria for the insanity defense.

Open Case as PDF

Oklahoma Court Case: Death Penalty Upheld

In a 2007 case, the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals made a significant decision. They upheld a death sentence, even though there was evidence that the defendant had a serious mental illness caused by methamphetamine use. The court decided that this drug-induced psychosis didn't meet the legal definition of insanity. This means the defendant was still held responsible for their actions, despite their mental state.

Open Case as PDF

The Case of the Sick Mind

In 2007, a court in Oklahoma decided to give someone the death penalty. This was even though there was proof the person had a really sick mind because of using meth. The court said that being mentally ill from drugs wasn't enough to stop the death penalty.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

No. D-2005-600

Highlights