Resource Library

Topics

Filters

Resource Library

New to the Resource Library?

Learn how to navigate, search, and use our resources effectively.

How to use the Library

Testifying About Trauma: A Call for Science and Civility

The article finds that focusing on a PTSD diagnosis in legal cases can hinder understanding the true impact of trauma. It suggests trauma-informed evaluations are a more ethical approach than strictly adhering to diagnostic labels.

TraumaPTSDExpert WitnessLegal ProceedingsDiagnostic CriteriaTrauma-Informed CarePersonal NarrativeDSM-5Psychic TraumaForensic Context
(2017)

An Integrated Neuroscience Perspective on Formulation and Treatment Planning for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: An Educational Review

PTSD, first diagnosed in 1980, describes lasting difficulty recovering from trauma. It is caused by the brain's learned fear responses, where neutral cues become triggers for distress and avoidance.

PTSDTraumaFear ConditioningNeurobiologyEpigeneticsMemory ReconsolidationDysregulated CircuitsGeneticsPsychotherapyStress Response
(2017)

Brief of Amicus Curiae the Innocence Project, Inc. in Support of Defendant-Appellant

The Innocence Project supports reversing a conviction based on cross-racial identification. It argues scientific evidence shows a higher risk of misidentification when witnesses and defendants are of different races.

Cross-racial identificationInnocence Projecteyewitness identificationcross-race effectwrongful convictionsjury instructionsDNA evidencemisidentification
(2017)

Brief of Amicus Curiae the Innocence Project

This brief argues for limiting first-time in-court stranger identifications due to scientific research on mistaken eyewitness accounts. It asserts these identifications are suggestive, lack value, and can lead to wrongful convictions.

mistaken eyewitness identificationssuggestivestrangerprejudicialInnocence Project
(2017)

Brief of the American Psychological Association as Amicus Curiae in Support of Defendant-Appellant

The brief argues juries should be informed about the unreliability of cross-racial identifications. This instruction is needed because research shows own-race bias, jurors often misunderstand it, and mistaken IDs cause wrongful convictions.

cross-racial identificationsown-race biaseyewitness identificationswrongful convictionsjury instructionsjuror understandingmistaken identity
(2017)

Brief for Amicus Curiae the Innocence Project Supporting Petitioner-Appellant and Urging Reversal

This brief argues that Gregory Bolin’s conviction should be reversed. It asserts that the conviction relied too heavily on flawed eyewitness identification, a type of evidence often linked to wrongful convictions.

Eyewitness identificationfalse convictionswrongful convictionsjury reasoningeyewitness testimonyunreliabilitypolice pressure
(2017)

Brief for the American Psychological Association as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellant

The brief argues that single-photograph identifications are inherently suggestive and should be presumed inadmissible. Such identifications distort memory and create a high risk of wrongful conviction.

Single-photograph identificationsinadmissibledistort memorywitness confidencewrongful convictionwitness confidencememory distortion
(2017)

Mental Health and Trauma in Asylum Seekers Landing in Sicily in 2015: a Descriptive Study of Neglected Invisible Wounds

Forcibly displaced individuals, including asylum seekers in Italy, often face significant mental health challenges due to trauma and post-migration stress. Access to mental health care is limited for these vulnerable populations.

asylum seekersmental healthPTSDdepressiontraumamigrationItaly
(2017)

Commonwealth v. Henry

The SJC ruled judges must consider a defendant's ability to pay restitution and cannot extend probation due to poverty. This reasoning has been used to challenge mandatory abstinence conditions.

restitutionprobationpovertyindigent defendantsprobation conditions
(2016)

A Neuroscience Perspective on Sexual Risk Behavior in Adolescence and Emerging Adulthood

Young people (15-24) account for 50% of new STIs and have high rates of unintended pregnancies. This is linked to low condom use and multiple partners, and "heat of the moment" decisions despite knowing risks.

TeenagersYoung adultsRisky sexual behaviorsThreatsRewardsDecision-makingControlRisk-taking
(2016)

Marshall v. Eyecare Specialties, P.C. of Lincoln

The Nebraska Supreme Court found alcoholism can be a disability under state law. However, the employee's firing was upheld, as it was due to performance, not her addiction.

alcoholismdisabilityemployerfiredaddictionperformance issuesemployee
(2016)

Williams v. State

A 17-year-old convicted of felony murder appealed his life sentence with parole. A court ruled he deserves a hearing to determine if his parole date effectively creates a life without parole sentence.

juvenile offenderlife sentenceparole eligibilityAtwell v. StateHorsley v. StateMiller v. Alabamade facto sentence of life without parole
(2016)

Stallings v. State

A 17-year-old was sentenced to life with parole for battery, robbery, and assault. The court ruled he must receive a new parole hearing to ensure a meaningful chance of release.

juvenile offenderlife sentenceparole eligibilityAtwell v. StateHorsley v. State
(2016)

Atwell v. State

Florida's Supreme Court ruled a life sentence with parole for a 16-year-old was unconstitutional. The state's parole system offered no meaningful release opportunity, violating Miller v. Alabama.

juvenile offenderMiller v. Alabamalife sentenceparole eligibilityde facto sentence of life without paroleHenry v. State
(2016)

State v. Garza

The court affirmed a 90-year sentence for a juvenile convicted of murder. This was not considered a de facto life sentence, and life without parole is still permissible in some cases.

juvenile offenderlife without parolejuvenile life without paroleJLWOPde facto life sentenceMiller v. Alabama
(2016)