Resource Library
New to the Resource Library?
Learn how to navigate, search, and use our resources effectively.
De'lonta v. Johnson
The court found a transgender inmate could sue prison officials for denying gender-affirming surgery evaluation. Officials ignored medical standards despite a serious self-harm risk.
Adolescent Brain Development in Normality and Psychopathology
Adolescence is a time of increased risk-taking behaviors, leading to preventable deaths and mental health issues for some. However, it is also a period of profound opportunity and positive social development for many.
Digital Peer Interactions Affect Risk Taking in Young Adults
Young adults engage in high rates of risk-taking due to brain development and peer influence. Their socio-emotional and reward networks are highly active, while cognitive control networks are still maturing.
Maturation of the Adolescent Brain
The adolescent brain undergoes significant development, with ongoing changes in its structure and function. This brain maturation, influenced by hormones and environment, impacts self-control, decision-making, and risk-taking behaviors.
People v. Davis
The court upheld a conviction for MDMA possession and sale. It used scientific treatises to classify the substance, even without expert testimony.
Young v. State
A juvenile offender received life sentences for armed robbery, later reduced to 30 years. The court ruled this new sentence provided a realistic opportunity for release, satisfying Supreme Court guidance.
State v. Brown
The court ruled that sentencing a juvenile to multiple terms exceeding a life sentence for non-homicide crimes does not violate the ban on juvenile life without parole.
State v. Hart
The Missouri Supreme Court ruled that sentencing a juvenile to life without parole for murder violates the Eighth Amendment. Mr. Hart's case was sent back for a new sentence.
Parker v. State
The court found Mr. Parker's life without parole sentence violated the Eighth Amendment, based on a U.S. Supreme Court decision. This requires re-sentencing for the murder conviction.
Jackson v. Norris
The Arkansas Supreme Court ruled mandatory life without parole for juveniles unconstitutional. Kuntrell Jackson, convicted at 14, received a new sentencing hearing to consider his age and crime.
State v. Pearson
The Iowa Supreme Court ruled that a 50-year sentence for a 17-year-old was cruel and unusual. The court emphasized considering a juvenile's age and potential for rehabilitation during sentencing.
State v. Ragland
The Iowa Supreme Court found a juvenile's life sentence, even commuted, was unconstitutional under federal law. The Court said the district court should resentence the defendant.
State v. Null
The Iowa Supreme Court sent a juvenile's case back for resentencing. His combined 75-year sentence for murder and robbery was considered a "de facto" life sentence, requiring special protections for juveniles.
Brief of Amicus Curiae Juvenile Law Center on Behalf of Appellant Eric Long
The brief argues a life without parole sentence for a juvenile is unconstitutional. It claims the trial court failed to consider the appellant's youth, which generally counsels against such harsh punishment.
Brief of the Wayne County Prosecuting Attorney
The brief argues a trial judge cannot direct the Parole Board. It asserts denying parole eligibility for juvenile first-degree murderers is unconstitutional, making them eligible for parole after 15 years.