Resource Library

Topics

Filters

Resource Library

New to the Resource Library?

Learn how to navigate, search, and use our resources effectively.

How to use the Library

Hill v. Lockhart

The Court ruled the Strickland test for ineffective counsel applies to guilty pleas. A defendant must prove their attorney made serious errors and they would have chosen trial instead; Hill did not prove this.

(1985)

United States v. Lyons

The court rejected drug addiction alone as an insanity defense. It narrowed the legal standard, requiring an inability to appreciate wrongfulness, not to control one's actions.

Insanity defensedrug addictionfederal caselegal standardinability to appreciate wrongfulnesslack of controlLyons casecriminal responsibilityaddiction as defensewrongfulness
(1984)

People v. Bledsoe

The court ruled expert testimony on rape trauma syndrome cannot prove a rape occurred.

inadmissibilityexpert testimonyrape trauma syndrome
(1984)

Wellman v. Faulkner

The prison's overcrowding and infrequent medical care violated the Eighth Amendment. This showed deliberate indifference, requiring remedies and damages.

(1983)

United States v. Place

The Supreme Court ruled that seizing luggage for an extended time without probable cause is unconstitutional. A brief dog sniff, however, is not considered a search.

probable causeseizureluggageunreasonable seizuredog
(1983)

Eddings v. Oklahoma

The Supreme Court ruled courts must consider all mitigating factors, like a troubled childhood, when sentencing someone to death. This reversed a death sentence for a 16-year-old whose abuse was ignored.

Eighth Amendmentmitigating factorsdeath penaltycapital crimejuvenile sentencing
(1982)

People v. Cardenas

The California Supreme Court ruled that evidence of a defendant's friends' drug use was unfairly prejudicial and could not be admitted in court. This decision affirmed fair trial protections.

prejudicial evidenceinadmissible evidencefair trialdefendantdrug useevidence admissibility
(1982)

State v. Saldana

The court reversed a sexual assault conviction. Expert testimony about rape trauma syndrome and victim credibility was improperly admitted.

sexual assaultconvictionreversedexpert testimonyrape trauma syndromecredibility
(1982)

People v. Shirley

The California Supreme Court reversed a rape conviction, ruling that testimony from a hypnotized witness was inadmissible. Hypnosis was not considered a generally accepted scientific method for reliable memory retrieval.

rape convictionhypnosismemory retrievalscientific acceptanceinadmissible testimonyreliable methodwitness testimonymemory restoration
(1982)

Rhodes v. Chapman

The Supreme Court ruled that prison conditions violate the Eighth Amendment only if they inflict unnecessary pain or are grossly disproportionate to the crime.

prison conditionsEighth Amendmentunnecessary painwanton paindisproportionatecrime severity
(1981)

Inmates of Allegheny Cty. Jail v. Pierce

The court found potential constitutional violations in a jail's psychiatric care due to inadequate staffing. It upheld bans on contact visits and methadone for pretrial detainees.

pretrial detaineesjail conditionscontact visitsmethadonepsychiatric careconstitutional violationsinadequate staffingfederal casecourt rulingremanded
(1979)

Bell v. Wolfish

The Supreme Court ruled pretrial detainees cannot be punished before conviction. However, restrictions reasonably related to legitimate government objectives are not considered punishment.

Due Process Clausepretrial detaineespunishmentconvictionrestrictions
(1979)

New York City Transit Authority v. Beazer

The Court upheld a transit authority's ban on methadone users working, finding it did not violate equal protection.

methadone usersEqual Protection Clauseemployment discriminationdisability discriminationsubstance uselegal precedentemployment law
(1979)

Bordenkircher v. Hayes

The Supreme Court ruled that prosecutors can threaten or bring harsher charges during plea bargaining if the defendant doesn't plead guilty, as long as the charges have probable cause.

(1978)

Todaro v. Ward

The court held that consistent delays and denials of medical care in prison can show deliberate indifference. This means systemic failures in care can be unconstitutional, not just isolated incidents.

prison medical caredeliberate indifferencesystemic failuresconstitutional claimnegligencedelays
(1977)