Summary
The Supreme Court determined that an eyewitness identification, even if obtained through a suggestive process, can be used in court. This is permissible if, considering all the surrounding factors, the identification is dependable enough to prevent a significant chance of an incorrect identification.
Summary
The Supreme Court determined that if an eyewitness identification is obtained using a method that might influence the witness, it can still be used as evidence. This is allowed if, after looking at all the facts, the identification is considered dependable enough to prevent a high chance of a mistaken identity.
Summary
The Supreme Court decided that if an eyewitness identifies someone using a method that might influence their choice, this identification can still be used in court. This is allowed if, after looking at all the facts, the identification is dependable enough to prevent a high chance of someone being wrongly identified.
Summary
The Supreme Court decided that if a witness identifies someone in a way that might lead them to pick the wrong person, that identification can still be used in court. This is allowed if, after looking at all the facts, the identification seems dependable enough that it is not likely to be a mistake.