United States v. Bass
SimpleOriginal

Summary

In this federal case, Bass, addicted to Demerol, raised an insanity defense. The court held that such addiction could be relevant to sanity and reversed his conviction, finding the government failed to rebut expert testimony.

1974 | Federal Juristiction

United States v. Bass

Keywords Demerol addiction; insanity defense; federal case; Bass case; drug addiction; sanity; conviction; expert testimony; government; rebuttal
Open Case as PDF

Summary

In Bass, the defendant's Demerol addiction formed the basis of an insanity defense. The appellate court reversed the conviction, determining that the prosecution did not adequately refute expert evidence attesting to the defendant's diminished capacity due to his addiction. The ruling establishes the legal relevance of substance addiction in determining criminal culpability.

Open Case as PDF

Bass Case: Insanity Defense and Demerol Addiction

The federal case of Bass involved an insanity defense predicated on the defendant's Demerol addiction. The court acknowledged the potential relevance of such an addiction to the defendant's sanity. Consequently, the court overturned Bass's conviction, citing the prosecution's failure to effectively challenge the expert testimony presented by the defense.

Open Case as PDF

Bass Case: Insanity Defense and Demerol Addiction

Bass, struggling with Demerol addiction, used an insanity defense in his federal trial. The court acknowledged that his addiction could impact his sanity. His conviction was overturned because the prosecution didn't successfully challenge the expert witnesses who testified on his behalf.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

Bass, who was addicted to a strong pain medicine called Demerol, said he wasn't responsible for his actions because he was not mentally well. The judge agreed that his addiction could affect his mental state. The judge overturned Bass's conviction because the government didn't prove that Bass was responsible for his actions.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

490 F.2d 846 (1974)

Highlights