People v. Lorentzen
SimpleOriginal

Summary

In this 1972 case, the MI Supreme Court struck down a 20-year mandatory minimum for marijuana sale as cruel and unusual, citing disproportionality and evidence that shorter sentences better serve nonviolent offender rehabilitation.

1972 | State Juristiction

People v. Lorentzen

Keywords mandatory minimum sentence; marijuana sale; cruel and unusual punishment; disproportionality; nonviolent offender; rehabilitation; shorter sentences; drug sentencing
Open Case as PDF

The People v. Lorentzen: A Case Study in Sentencing Disparity

The 1972 Michigan Supreme Court decision in People v. Lorentzen addressed the constitutionality of a twenty-year mandatory minimum sentence for marijuana distribution. The court found the sentence to be cruel and unusual punishment, a violation of the Eighth Amendment, due to its disproportionate severity and its demonstrably ineffective contribution to the rehabilitation of non-violent offenders. The ruling highlighted the need for sentencing practices that reflect a nuanced understanding of criminal justice and the potential for rehabilitation. Empirical evidence presented to the court indicated that shorter sentences yielded more positive outcomes in terms of recidivism reduction. The decision established a precedent for judicial review of mandatory minimum sentencing, emphasizing the importance of proportionality and rehabilitation in criminal justice.

Open Case as PDF

Michigan's 1972 Mandatory Minimum Sentence Ruling

The 1972 Michigan Supreme Court case addressed the constitutionality of a twenty-year mandatory minimum sentence for marijuana sale. The court found the sentence to be unconstitutional, characterizing it as cruel and unusual punishment. The ruling cited the disproportionate nature of the sentence in relation to the crime and presented evidence suggesting that shorter sentences proved more effective in rehabilitating non-violent offenders.

Open Case as PDF

Michigan's Marijuana Minimum Sentence

In 1972, Michigan's Supreme Court declared a 20-year mandatory minimum sentence for selling marijuana unconstitutional. The court deemed the sentence cruel and unusual punishment. The ruling highlighted the disproportionate impact of such a long sentence and argued that shorter sentences would be more effective in rehabilitating non-violent offenders.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

In 1972, Michigan's highest court said a 20-year prison sentence for selling marijuana was too harsh. They thought it was unfair because the punishment didn't fit the crime, especially since shorter sentences help people who haven't hurt anyone to get better.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

387 Mich. 167 (1972)

Highlights