Resource Library
New to the Resource Library?
Learn how to navigate, search, and use our resources effectively.
Adolescent Brain Development and Drugs
Adolescent brains are still developing, especially the parts for logical reasoning and impulse control. This makes young people more prone to risk-taking and vulnerable to drug use, particularly in emotional or peer-influenced situations.
Braking and Accelerating of the Adolescent Brain
Adolescents act more impulsively and engage in riskier behavior than adults. This behavior stems from an imbalance in brain development, where emotion-driven regions mature faster than areas responsible for self-control.
Early Health Risk Factors for Violence: Conceptualization, Evidence, and Implications
Research on violence and aggression has overlooked early childhood health factors, especially prenatal ones. Current theories often miss integrating social, biological, and health risk factors in understanding how these behaviors develop.
Juvenile Justice in the US: Facts for Policymakers
Adolescent brains are still developing, impacting decision-making and increasing risk-taking. Incarceration in traditional facilities harms many nonviolent youth and fails to provide needed services, contributing to re-arrests.
Maturation of Limbic Corticostriatal Activation and Connectivity Associated with Developmental Changes in Temporal Discounting
The article examines how foresighted adaptive behavior and self-control develop through adolescence. It notes that impulsivity and risk-taking are common in this period, and it explores how the brain matures to affect these behaviors.
'Willpower' Over the Life Span: Decomposing Self-Regulation
Early "marshmallow test" studies found that children's ability to delay gratification predicted better outcomes in adulthood, including higher SAT scores and coping skills. The research now examines the biological basis of self-regulation.
Rhoades v. Henry
The court found that new expert opinions on the defendant's mental state were speculative and did not show that lawyer error impacted the case outcome. Strong aggravating evidence weighed against prejudice claims.
State v. Folk
The Idaho Supreme Court overturned a conviction, finding no evidence that a defendant's voice would traumatize a child witness. Restrictions on cross-examination were therefore unsupported.
State v. Stewart
The court reversed a murder conviction, ruling that evidence of decades of abuse was relevant. Cumulative trauma can impact reasoning and intent, affecting premeditation and malice.
Brief of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner
The brief argues New Hampshire courts violated due process by not assessing suggestive identification reliability, regardless of state action. It asserts reliability is key for admitting identification evidence to ensure fair trials.
Brief for the American Psychological Association as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioner
The brief argues that eyewitness identifications can be unreliable, violating due process rights. It contends that courts should assess identification reliability regardless of whether state actors caused the suggestive circumstances.
Brief of Amicus Curiae the Innocence Network in Support of Petitioner, Supporting Reversal
The petitioner argues New Hampshire courts violated due process by refusing to assess the likelihood of misidentification in a suggestive pre-trial lineup.
New Jersey v. Henderson
The NJ Supreme Court revised the state's eyewitness identification rules based on memory science. This expands pretrial reviews and requires stronger jury instructions on reliability.
State v. Obeta
The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that expert testimony about typical rape-victim behaviors can be used to counter consent defenses, as such evidence is not automatically excluded.
Langford v. Norris
The court allowed inmates' claims to proceed, finding officials were indifferent to inadequate care and a grievance system that blocked access to treatment.