Resource Library

Topics

Filters

Resource Library

New to the Resource Library?

Learn how to navigate, search, and use our resources effectively.

How to use the Library

People v. Rainer

The Colorado Supreme Court upheld a juvenile’s 40-year sentence. The court found that Miller v. Alabama, which banned mandatory life without parole for juveniles, did not apply to a long term-of-years sentence.

juvenile LWOPEighth Amendment (U.S.)Miller v. Alabamaineligibility for paroleaggregate sentence

People v. Ybanez

The court upheld a juvenile's murder conviction and life sentence. It found no Sixth Amendment violation from a potential conflict of interest, nor a right to a guardian ad litem under state law.

guardian ad litemjuvenile offenderLWOPjuvenile life without paroleyouth tried as an adultmurder conviction

People v. Walker

The Illinois Appellate Court upheld a life sentence without parole for a 17-year-old convicted of felony murder. The court found the sentence was not mandatory and therefore did not violate state or federal proportionate penalties clauses.

LWOPIllinois ConstitutionMiller v. Alabama juvenile life without parolecruel and unusual punishmentEighth Amendment (U.S.)Proportionate Penalties Clause

Watson v. Illinois

The court affirmed Kevin Watson's murder and aggravated vehicular hijacking convictions and sentences. Watson was found guilty of first-degree murder and aggravated vehicular hijacking, receiving consecutive sentences totaling 60 years.

State of Illinoisaggravated vehicular hijackingyouth tried as an adultfirst-degree murder

Estrada-Huerta v. People

The Colorado Supreme Court ruled a juvenile's lengthy, consecutive sentences for kidnapping and sexual assault are not life without parole, as he remains eligible for parole.

juvenile offender sentencingjuvenile LWOPColorado Supreme Courtparole eligibilityconsecutive sentences

Armstrong v. People

The Court found a 96-year sentence for a 16-year-old murder accomplice constitutional. Her sentence, though lengthy, offered parole eligibility, providing a meaningful chance for release.

juvenile offenderparole eligibilityEighth Amendment (U.S.)cruel and unusual punishmentmeaningful opportunity for releaseColorado Supreme Courtsecond-degree murder

Lucero v. People

The Colorado Supreme Court upheld a juvenile's lengthy sentence, finding it was not cruel and unusual punishment. The court distinguished it from life without parole, noting parole eligibility technically existed.

juvenile LWOPEighth Amendment (U.S.)cruel and unusual punishmentconsecutive sentencingright to rehabilitationparole eligibilityjuvenile justice

Martinez v. United States of America

The court held juvenile life sentences for RICO convictions were not restricted by new Supreme Court rulings. This was because the convictions included various crimes, not just murder.

juvenile life sentenceRICO ActRICO-murderretroactive application of new law

Hobbs v. Gordon

The Arkansas Supreme Court affirmed that Miller v. Alabama, which bars mandatory life without parole for juveniles, applies retroactively. This ruling upheld the decision to grant Ulonzo Gordon relief from his juvenile life sentence.

Miller v. AlabamaEighth Amendment (U.S.)cruel and unusual punishmentequal protection violationFourteenth Amendment (U.S.)Arkansas Supreme Court

Layman v. State

The Indiana Supreme Court reversed felony murder convictions for two juveniles. It found the evidence insufficient and facts differed from previous cases, remanding for new proceedings.

juvenile offendersIndiana Supreme Courtfelony murderadolescent brain sciencejuvenile justice

State v. Soto

The court ruled that mandatory life without parole for juveniles is unconstitutional. This applied retroactively, allowing re-sentencing for those convicted as teenagers like Michael Soto.

Eighth Amendment (U.S.)juvenile justiceLWOPjuvenile life without parolejuvenile offenderscruel and unusual punishmentretroactive application of Miller

Jones v. Commonwealth

The court ruled that a juvenile's life sentence without parole was permissible because Virginia's law allowed some parole possibility, differing from the mandatory sentences restricted by *Miller v. Alabama*.

juvenile LWOPEighth Amendment (U.S.)cruel and unusual punishmentjuvenile justicejuvenile offendersretroactive applicationMiller v. AlabamaVirginia Supreme Court

People v. Palafox

The Court of Appeal overturned a gang-related probation condition for a 16-year-old convicted of murder. It found no evidence linking gang activity to the crime or rehabilitation needs.

juvenile offenderprobation conditionsjuvenile LWOPjuvenile resentencing

People v. Vigil

The Colorado Supreme Court ruled that Miller v. Alabama, banning mandatory life without parole for juveniles, does not apply retroactively to cases already finalized, upholding Vigil's sentence.

juvenile life without paroleLWOPMiller v. Alabamaretroactive application of Millermandatory LWOP

Songster v. Beard

The court sent a juvenile lifer's case back to reconsider his sentence after a Supreme Court ruling banned mandatory life without parole for minors. The court did not decide if the new rule applied retroactively.

juvenile life without paroleLWOPMiller v. Alabamaretroactive application of Millercruel and unusual punishmentEighth Amendment (U.S.)