Resource Library

Topics

Filters

Resource Library

New to the Resource Library?

Learn how to navigate, search, and use our resources effectively.

How to use the Library

State v. Moore

The Ohio Supreme Court upheld a lengthy sentence for a juvenile convicted of violent crimes. The court ruled the sentence, though long, did not violate the Eighth Amendment as it allowed for eventual release.

Eighth Amendment (U.S.)cruel and unusual punishmentjuvenile sentencingaggregate sentenceOhio Supreme Courtmandatory life without parole

State v. Mares

The Wyoming Supreme Court found that a juvenile life without parole sentence was unconstitutional. However, changes in state law already made the defendant eligible for parole, making the specific challenge moot.

LWOPfirst-degree murderretroactive application of Miller Miller v. Alabamacruel and unusual punishmentEighth Amendment (U.S.)juvenile justiceWyoming Supreme Courtjuvenile life without parole

People v. Carp

The Michigan Supreme Court ruled Miller v. Alabama, which banned mandatory juvenile life without parole, was not retroactive. It also affirmed that such sentences are not categorically barred by the Eighth Amendment or Michigan law.

child convicted of murderindividualised sentence LWOPretroactive application of MillerMiller v. AlabamaEighth Amendment (U.S.)juvenile offenderscruel and unusual punishmentMichigan Constitutionsentencing guidelines

Martin v. Symmes

The court ruled that Miller v. Alabama, which banned mandatory juvenile life without parole, does not apply retroactively. This prevented Martin from challenging his prior Minnesota sentence.

juvenile resentencingLWOPEighth Amendment (U.S.)juvenile justicecruel and unusual punishmentjuvenile offendersMiller v. Alabamahabeas corpus8th Circuit Court of Appealsretroactive application

Bowen v. Kendrick

The Supreme Court upheld federal funding for adolescent pregnancy prevention programs, ruling they served a secular purpose despite religious organization involvement. The Court found no unconstitutional establishment of religion.

teenage pregnancyright to abortionright to abortion for youth

In re Gault

The Supreme Court ruled that juveniles facing delinquency charges have fundamental due process rights, including notice, counsel, and protection against self-incrimination. This 15-year-old’s case established key protections for youth.

juvenile justicejuvenile rightsdue processconstitutional guaranteesFourteenth Amendment (U.S.)

J.D.B. v. North Carolina

The Supreme Court held a child's age is a factor in determining if they are in police custody for Miranda warnings. A 14-year-old was questioned without warnings and confessed.

interrogation of youthMirandapolice custodyFifth Amendment (U.S.) Miranda warningsjuvenile interrogation

Miller v. Alabama

The Supreme Court ruled mandatory life without parole sentences for juveniles convicted of murder are unconstitutional. Judges must now consider a juvenile's age and background before sentencing.

mandatory life without parolejuvenile LWOPindividualised sentence hearingEighth Amendment (U.S.)cruel and unusual punishmentjuvenile justice

Jones v. Mississippi

The Supreme Court ruled that a life-without-parole sentence for a juvenile offender does not require a separate finding of permanent incorrigibility. Judges can consider age along with other factors in sentencing.

juvenile LWOPlife without parolejuvenile offendersMiller v. Alabamamandatory sentencingEighth Amendment (U.S.)cruel and unusual punishmentMississippi Supreme Courtpermanent incorrigibilityU.S. Supreme Court

Roper v. Simmons

The Supreme Court ruled that executing minors is unconstitutional, violating the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. The decision cited evolving standards, juvenile brain development, and potential for rehabilitation.

death penaltyLWOPjuvenile justiceEighth Amendment (U.S.)cruel and unusual punishmentcapital punishmentdeath penalty for juveniles

DeMola v. Cavazos

The court upheld a juvenile murder conviction, finding proper grounds to remove a juror. It noted the life without parole sentence considered mitigating factors and allowed for future review.

individual sentencingjuvenile justiceLWOPjuvenile life without parolejuvenile sentencing

Banks v. People

The Colorado Supreme Court remanded a juvenile life without parole sentence after Miller v. Alabama. The trial court must determine if life without parole is still appropriate; otherwise, life with parole applies.

LWOPjuvenile sentencingEighth Amendment (U.S.)cruel and unusual punishmentjuvenile offendersretroactive application

Commonwealth v. Brown

The court ruled mandatory life without parole for juveniles is unconstitutional, applying a U.S. Supreme Court decision to a 17-year-old convicted of murder. It also reviewed his statements to police.

LWOPjuvenile justicefelony murder ruleaccomplice liabilityMiller v. AlabamaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court juvenile offendersMiranda rights

Falcon v. State

The Florida Supreme Court ruled that mandatory life without parole sentences for juvenile homicide offenders are unconstitutional and apply retroactively. This decision ensures resentencing hearings consider the offender's youth.

retroactive application of MillerMiller v. AlabamaLWOPmandatory life sentenceEighth Amendment (U.S.)cruel and unusual punishment

Henry v. State

The Florida Supreme Court overturned a juvenile offender's life sentence for sexual battery, ruling it unconstitutional. The sentence denied a meaningful chance for release based on maturity and reform.

juvenile LWOPEighth Amendment (U.S.)cruel and unusual punishmentGraham v. Floridameaningful opportunity for releasejuvenile resentencing