Resource Library

Topics

Filters

Resource Library

New to the Resource Library?

Learn how to navigate, search, and use our resources effectively.

How to use the Library

Commonwealth v. Romanelli

A juvenile offender initially sentenced to life without parole for murder appealed his resentencing. The court found the lower court failed to consider rehabilitation potential, vacating the sentence and remanding the case.

LWOPjuvenile life without parolemandatory minimum sentencesrehabilitation potentialresentencing

State v. Diaz

The court upheld a juvenile's transfer to adult court for assault but ordered a hearing on whether Miranda rights were knowingly waived before her statements to police.

potential for rehabilitation of youthLWOPjuvenile life without paroleMiranda rightsjuvenile transferaggravated assault

Kelsey v. State

The Florida Supreme Court ruled that a ban on life sentences for juvenile non-homicide offenders applied retroactively. However, the Court found Kelsey's resentenced term of years to be appropriate given his crimes.

juvenile offenderLWOPresentencingretroactive applicationGraham v. Floridajuvenile life without parole

Commonwealth v. Jones

The court held that mandatory life sentences for juveniles are unconstitutional. It ordered a new sentencing hearing for Jones, who was sentenced as a juvenile, to consider his youth and rehabilitation potential.

LWOPjuvenile justicejuvenile offender post-conviciton reliefretroactive application of MillerMiller v. Alabamarehabilitation potential of juvenilesEighth Amendment (U.S.)

Vasquez v. Virginia

The Virginia Supreme Court upheld a lengthy sentence for a juvenile offender's felonies. The court ruled the sentence was not cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment.

juvenile offendergeriatric releaseLWOPcruel and unusual punishmentEighth Amendment (U.S.)

Commonwealth v. Phillips

The court found a juvenile's life sentence without parole was untimely challenged. Although mandatory juvenile life sentences are unconstitutional, this ruling did not automatically apply to Phillips's old case.

Miller v. Alabamaretroactive application of MillerLWOPjuvenile life without paroleresentencing of juvenile offendersPennsylvania Post-Conviction Relief Act (PCRA)

State v. Long

The Ohio Supreme Court ruled that juvenile life without parole sentences require courts to consider youth and rehabilitation potential. This partially affirmed a juvenile offender's challenge to his sentence for multiple murders.

juvenile offender sentencingjuvenile life without paroleLWOPEighth Amendment (U.S.)proportionality principleMiller v. Alabamaresentencingrehabilitation potential of youth

Moore v. Gwathney

A federal case argues Alabama's parole board makes release impossible for people sentenced as juveniles to life without parole. The plaintiffs seek a court order for a meaningful chance at parole.

LWOPjuvenile life without paroleEighth Amendment (U.S.)cruel and unusual punishmentmeaningful opportunity for parolejuvenile resentencing

Kedrowitz v. State

The court affirmed a 100-year sentence for a 13-year-old who killed his siblings. It found the defendant competent and the sentence not cruel or unusual, despite arguments about his youth.

LWOPdevelopmental differencesneuroscientific research

People v. Hardin

The California Supreme Court upheld a life without parole sentence for a 25-year-old. The court found no equal protection violation in denying parole opportunities available to younger offenders.

early releaseLWOPjuvenile life without paroleCalifornia Supreme Courtyoung offender

Commonwealth v. King

The court denied King’s appeal to overturn a previous order. He sought post-conviction relief regarding his original case.

de facto life sentenceLWOPjuvenile life without paroleresentencing hearing potential for rehabilitation of juvenilesPennsylvania Post-Conviction Relief ActMiller v. Alabamaretroactive application of Miller

People v. Taylor

The Michigan Supreme Court held that mandatory life without parole for juveniles is unconstitutional and applies retroactively. Robert Taylor's case was sent back for resentencing to consider his youth.

juvenile resentencingLWOPMiller v. Alabamajuvenile life without paroleMichigan Supreme Court

People v. Paredes

A 17-year-old convicted of murder challenged his mandatory life sentence. The court upheld it, citing his leadership and efforts to hide evidence, despite a ruling against such sentences for juveniles.

LWOPjuvenile life without paroleMiller v. AlabamaMichigan Court of Appeals

Montgomery v. Louisiana

The Supreme Court ruled that a previous ban on mandatory life without parole for juveniles applies retroactively. Henry Montgomery, sentenced as a 17-year-old, gained a chance for resentencing with parole.

death penaltyLWOPcruel and unusual punishmentretroactive applicationEighth Amendment (U.S.)juvenile life without paroleMiller v. Alabama

Hartigan v. Zbaraz

The Illinois Parental Notice Abortion Act, requiring minors to notify a parent before an abortion, was found unconstitutional. A federal court ruled the waiting period and judicial bypass procedures created an undue burden.

mandatory waiting periodsabortion procedure for minorsparental notificationabortion