Resource Library

Topics

Filters

Select a Year Range
Clear Filters

Resource Library

New to the Resource Library?

Learn how to navigate, search, and use our resources effectively.

How to use the Library

Equal Employment Opportunity Comm'n v. Hussey Copper Ltd

Employers must individually assess methadone users' ability to perform jobs. A blanket denial violated the ADA, resulting in a settlement for the applicant.

methadonediscriminationADAdisabilityemployment lawreasonable accommodationdrug testing
(2010)

People v. Becker

The court upheld a murder conviction, finding the defendant's methamphetamine use was linked to the crime. Drug use did not establish a successful mental state defense in this case.

convictionmethamphetamine usemurderdrug usemental state defense
(2010)

RHJ Medical Center, Inc. v. City of DuBois

The court ruled the city violated disability laws by using zoning rules to block a methadone clinic. This action discriminated against individuals with protected disabilities.

ADARehabilitation ActMethadone clinicZoning regulationsProtected disabilities
(2010)

Wyeth v. Levine

The Court ruled FDA drug label approval does not prevent state lawsuits over inadequate warnings. Injured patients can sue drug makers for insufficient information, as seen with Levine's Phenergan injection.

FDA approvaldrug labelspreemptionpharmaceutical liabilityproduct liability
(2009)

Erickson v. Pardus

The Supreme Court ruled a prisoner's claim of denied life-saving medical treatment for hepatitis C deserved a full hearing. This reinforced inmates' right to challenge prison medical care under the Eighth Amendment.

Eighth Amendmentprisoner rightsmedical careprison medical carehepatitis Cinmate healthcarecruel and unusual punishmentlife-saving treatment
(2007)

Malone v. State

The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals upheld a death sentence. It ruled that drug-induced psychosis did not meet the legal insanity threshold, despite evidence the defendant suffered from it.

capital punishmentlegal insanityinsanity defensemethamphetaminepsychosis
(2007)

Kimbrough v. US

The Supreme Court ruled that judges can consider the sentencing differences between crack and powder cocaine when applying advisory guidelines.

sentencingcrack cocainepowder cocainedisparitiesadvisory Guidelines
(2007)

New Directions Treatment Services v. City of Reading

The court reaffirmed drug addiction as a disability only if not currently using, while striking down discriminatory zoning against methadone clinics.

drug addictiondisabilitymethadone clinicszoningdiscriminatory
(2007)

Grisham v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

The court ruled a smoker's fraud and negligence claims against tobacco companies were not time-barred. This was because her nicotine addiction's delayed discovery impacted the statute of limitations.

statute of limitationsnicotine addictiontobacco companiesnegligence
(2007)

Phillips v. Jasper County Jail

The court found jail staff may have ignored an inmate's seizure medication needs and bunk request, but dismissed claims against the jail doctor.

deliberate indifferencejail staffmedical negligencemalpractice
(2006)

Wisconsin Community Services v. City of Milwaukee

The court ruled cities cannot discriminate against mental health and addiction centers when issuing special-use permits. These centers are entitled to reasonable accommodation under federal law.

municipal special-use permitsdiscriminationmental health treatment centersaddiction treatment centersreasonable accommodationADA
(2006)

Davis v. Carter

The Seventh Circuit ruled that Cook County’s repeated delays in providing methadone to an inmate could demonstrate deliberate indifference, equating delay with denial of care for a serious medical need.

methadoneinmatedeliberate indifferencedenial of careserious medical need
(2006)

Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal

The Court ruled that the religious use of a controlled substance was protected from federal prosecution under RFRA.

Religious Freedom Restoration ActRFRAreligious usecontrolled substancefederal prosecutionreligious exemption
(2006)

United States v. Georgia

The Court ruled the ADA applies to state prisons when constitutional rights are violated. This protects incarcerated individuals with disabilities, including those with substance use disorders.

ADATitle IIstate prisonssubstance use disorderdisability rights
(2006)

Gonzales v. Oregon

The Court held the Attorney General cannot ban doctors from prescribing drugs for state-authorized physician-assisted suicide. This ruling affirmed Oregon's right to allow the practice.

Controlled Substances Actphysician-assisted suicideprescription drugsstate-authorizeddoctors prescribing drugs
(2006)
1...131415...22