United States v. Georgia
SimpleOriginal

Summary

In this 2006 case, the Court held that Title II of the ADA validly applies to state prisons when constitutional rights are violated, reinforcing protections for incarcerated people with disabilities, including SUDs.

2006 | Federal Juristiction

United States v. Georgia

Keywords ADA; Title II; ADA Title II; state prisons; incarcerated people; disabilities; SUDs; constitutional rights; prison inmates; disability rights
Open Case as PDF

The 2006 Precedent on ADA Title II in State Prisons

The 2006 court decision established the applicability of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) to state prisons in instances of constitutional rights violations. This ruling significantly bolstered the legal protections afforded to incarcerated individuals with disabilities, encompassing those with substance use disorders (SUDs).

Open Case as PDF

Title II of the ADA and its Application to State Prisons

The 2006 ruling established the applicability of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) to state prisons in cases involving violations of constitutional rights. This decision significantly bolstered the legal protections afforded to incarcerated individuals with disabilities, specifically addressing those with substance use disorders (SUDs).

Open Case as PDF

2006 Court Ruling on ADA in Prisons

A 2006 court decision confirmed that the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) protects people with disabilities in state prisons. This means that if a prison violates the constitutional rights of someone with a disability, including those with substance use disorders (SUDs), the ADA applies. The ruling strengthened the legal protections available to incarcerated individuals with disabilities.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

In 2006, a court case decided that a law protecting people with disabilities (the ADA) also protects people in state prisons. This means that if a prisoner's rights are violated because of their disability, including substance use disorders (SUDs), they are protected by law.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

546 U.S. 151 (2006)

Highlights