Davis v. Carter
SimpleOriginal

Summary

In this case, the Seventh Circuit held Cook County’s routine delays in methadone for an inmate could show deliberate indifference, confirming that delay can equal denial of care for a serious medical need.

2006 | Federal Juristiction

Davis v. Carter

Keywords methadone; inmate; deliberate indifference; denial of care; serious medical need
Open Case as PDF

Summary

A ruling by the Seventh Circuit determined that Cook County's consistent delays in providing methadone to an inmate could demonstrate deliberate indifference. This decision affirmed the legal position that a significant delay in medical care for a serious health need can be equivalent to a complete denial of treatment.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that Cook County's regular delays in providing methadone to an incarcerated individual could demonstrate deliberate indifference. This decision reinforces the legal understanding that a significant delay in delivering necessary medical treatment can be considered equivalent to a denial of care for a serious medical condition.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

The Seventh Circuit Court determined that Cook County's consistent delays in providing methadone to an inmate could show a purposeful disregard for their medical needs. This decision confirmed that holding back or delaying essential medical care for a serious health condition can be considered the same as outright denying that care.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

A court made a decision about Cook County. The court said that when the county often made a person in prison wait for their methadone medicine, it could mean the county did not care enough about that person's health. The court also said that making someone wait for important medicine can be the same as not giving it to them at all, especially when they have a serious health problem.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

452 F.3d 686 (2006)

Highlights