Resource Library

Topics

Filters

Select a Year Range
Clear Filters

Resource Library

New to the Resource Library?

Learn how to navigate, search, and use our resources effectively.

How to use the Library

Breed v. Jones

The Supreme Court ruled that trying a juvenile as an adult for a crime they were already convicted of in juvenile court violates the Double Jeopardy Clause. Juvenile courts generally hold exclusive jurisdiction once a juvenile is tried.

juvenile offenderdouble jeopardyFifth Amendmentjuvenile court jurisdiction
(1975)

United States v. Bass

The court held that Demerol addiction is relevant to an insanity defense. Bass's conviction was reversed because the government did not rebut expert testimony.

Demerol addictioninsanity defensefederal caseBass casedrug addictionsanityconvictionexpert testimonygovernmentrebuttal
(1974)

Cudnik v. Kreiger

A 1974 case ruled that denying pretrial detainees prescribed methadone treatment violated due process. The court ordered jail officials to allow detainees continued access to their approved methadone programs.

pretrial detaineesmethadone treatment due processmethadone programsjail officials inmate healthcare
(1974)

O’Brien v Moriarty

The Court found cell confinement did not violate the 8th Amendment. However, it cautioned that arbitrary or prolonged solitary confinement could become unconstitutional, while deferring to prison security judgments.

cell confinement8th Amendmentsolitary confinementprison officialscruel and unusual punishmentprisoners' rights
(1974)

United States v. Kiffer

The court upheld marijuana distribution convictions, finding Congress's drug classification was rational. The law includes a mechanism for future scientific reassessment of the drug's status.

Schedule IMarijuanadistribution
(1973)

State v. Kanter

The Hawaii Supreme Court upheld marijuana criminalization, finding its classification as a narcotic did not violate due process or equal protection. Dissenting justices emphasized privacy.

marijuana possessionnarcoticsdue processequal protectionprivacyautonomycriminalization
(1972)

People v. Lorentzen

The Michigan Supreme Court found a 20-year mandatory minimum sentence for marijuana sale to be cruel and unusual, ruling it disproportionate and ineffective for nonviolent offender rehabilitation.

mandatory minimum sentencemarijuana salecruel and unusual punishmentdisproportionality nonviolent offenderrehabilitationshorter sentencesdrug sentencing
(1972)

People v Sinclair

The Michigan Supreme Court overturned a marijuana conviction, ruling that classifying cannabis as a narcotic violated equal protection, as scientific evidence showed it less harmful than opiates.

marijuana convictioncannabisnarcoticequal protectionscientific evidenceless harmfulless addictiveopiatesmarijuana
(1972)

Papachristou v. Jacksonville

The Supreme Court struck down a vague vagrancy law that allowed arbitrary arrests of marginalized people, including addicts. The ruling found the law lacked due process.

vagrancy lawdue processarbitrary arrestsmarginalized peopleaddictspushersunconstitutional
(1972)

Neil v. Biggers

The Supreme Court ruled that a suggestive eyewitness identification can be used as evidence if it is reliable enough to prevent a high chance of misidentification.

eyewitness identificationsuggestive procedureadmissibletotality of circumstancesmisidentification
(1972)

People v. McCabe

The Illinois Supreme Court ruled that classifying marijuana with hard narcotics and mandating a 10-year sentence for its sale violated equal protection due to a lack of rational basis.

Marijuanarational basisdrug classificationmandatory sentencehard narcoticsdrug classification
(1971)

Smith v. Follette

The 2nd Circuit Court upheld a law allowing judges to sentence people with drug addiction who committed felonies to prison instead of treatment. The ruling stated this did not violate due process or equal protection.

sentencing lawdrug addictionprisontreatmentdue processequal protectionfeloniesjudicial sentencing
(1971)

Holt v. Sarver

Arkansas prisons violated the Eighth Amendment with inadequate medical care and rehabilitation. The court found cruel and unusual punishment based on the overall conditions.

Eighth Amendmentprisonsmedical carerehabcruel and unusual punishmenttotality test
(1971)

Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents

This case established individuals can sue federal agents for Fourth Amendment violations, like warrantless drug raids. It paved the way for accountability in narcotics enforcement.

warrantless drug raidsfederal agentsnarcotics enforcementdrug raidspolice misconductcivil rights
(1971)

In Re Winship

The Supreme Court ruled that juvenile delinquency cases requiring confinement must prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, aligning with adult criminal trials. This heightened the burden of proof for serious juvenile offenses.

juvenile offenderjuvenile rightsburden of proofdue processFourteenth Amendment
(1970)