Boykin v. Alabama
SimpleOriginal

Summary

The Supreme Court held that a guilty plea must be made voluntarily and with full understanding of the rights being waived. Because the record did not show this, the plea was invalid and the conviction was reversed.

1969 | Federal Juristiction

Boykin v. Alabama

Keywords Supreme Court; guilty plea; voluntarily; understanding; rights waived; invalid plea; conviction reversed
Open Case as PDF

Summary

The Supreme Court determined that a guilty plea must be entered voluntarily and with a complete understanding of the rights being surrendered. Absent documentation within the legal record confirming these conditions, the plea was consequently deemed invalid. As a result, the associated conviction was overturned.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

The Supreme Court determined that a guilty plea must be made willingly and with a complete understanding of the legal rights that are being given up. In the particular case reviewed, the official court record did not demonstrate that these conditions were met. Consequently, the guilty plea was deemed legally invalid, and the conviction was overturned.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

The Supreme Court decided that a person's guilty plea must be given freely and with a complete understanding of the legal rights being given up. Since official records did not prove this happened, the guilty plea was not valid, and the conviction was overturned.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

The Supreme Court decided that a person who says they are guilty must do so freely. This person must also fully understand the legal rights they are giving up. The court's documents did not show that this happened. Because of this, the guilty plea was not correct. The court then canceled the decision that the person was guilty.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969)

Highlights