Resource Library
New to the Resource Library?
Learn how to navigate, search, and use our resources effectively.
US v. Raymer
The court upheld a drug conspiracy conviction, ruling that evidence of drug addiction did not negate proof of the defendant's knowing involvement in the drug distribution scheme.
Gray v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
A bank was found negligent for failing to protect an elderly couple from financial elder abuse under California law. The court held that banks have a duty to prevent such abuse.
Touby v. United States
The Supreme Court upheld the Attorney General's power to temporarily schedule new drugs under the CSA to prevent imminent hazards. This decision allows scheduling without immediate judicial review.
Alliance for Cannabis Therapeutics v. DEA
The D.C. Circuit Court sent back the DEA's denial to reclassify marijuana. The court found the DEA's reasoning "logically impossible" and requested clearer justification for its decision.
Shuamber v. Henderson
A crash victim may recover for serious emotional distress from witnessing a family member’s death in the same crash, even if their own physical injuries are minor.
Weaver v. Warden, Nevada State Prison
The Nevada Supreme Court ruled a veteran’s lawyer was ineffective for not presenting evidence of severe PTSD during sentencing. This omission may have changed the sentence.
US v. Piaget
The Fifth Circuit upheld a conviction, ruling that drug addiction is not a defense to knowing participation in a drug distribution conspiracy.
McDermott v. Bender
The court ruled a father's self-inflicted heroin addiction did not excuse his failure to pay child support or reduce his obligations.
Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. Smith
The Supreme Court ruled that neutral laws prohibiting peyote use are valid even when it is used for religious purposes, narrowing Free Exercise rights.
Maryland v. Craig
The Supreme Court held a child abuse victim can testify via one-way closed-circuit TV without violating the Sixth Amendment.
US v. Desurra
The court upheld a drug distribution conviction. It found methamphetamine intoxication did not negate the specific intent needed for the federal offense.
Thing v. La Chusa
The court limited emotional distress recovery to closely related bystanders who were present and aware of the injury.
State v. Pratt
The court affirmed a juvenile's murder conviction, ruling his age was not a factor for "heat of passion" and other evidence was properly excluded. The prosecutor's comments were also deemed fair.
Thompson v. Oklahoma
The Supreme Court ruled that executing individuals for murders committed under age 16 violates the Eighth Amendment. The Court determined age mitigates the crime.
People v. Reyes
The court upheld a drug possession conviction. Large drug quantities, packaging, and cash provided sufficient evidence of intent to sell.