In re Handa
SimpleOriginal

Summary

In this 1985 case, the court upheld denial of bail to a defendant in a narcotics case, citing public safety concerns and patterns of drug-related recidivism.

1985 | State Juristiction

In re Handa

Keywords 1985 case; bail; narcotics; defendant; public safety; drug-related; recidivism; denial of bail; court upheld; drug case
Open Case as PDF

Case Summary

The 1985 ruling affirmed the denial of bail, predicated on compelling concerns for public safety and demonstrable trends of recidivism among individuals involved in narcotics trafficking.

Open Case as PDF

United States v. Salerno (1985)

The 1985 Supreme Court case United States v. Salerno addressed the denial of bail for a defendant charged with narcotics offenses. The court's decision affirmed the legality of preventative detention, prioritizing public safety concerns and the defendant's demonstrated history of drug-related criminal activity. This ruling established a precedent allowing for pretrial detention based on the risk a defendant poses to the community, rather than solely on the likelihood of flight. The court weighed the potential harm to society against the defendant's right to pretrial liberty, ultimately finding that the former outweighed the latter in this instance. The decision continues to be a significant point of discussion regarding the balance between individual rights and societal safety in the criminal justice system.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

A 1985 court case refused bail to someone accused of drug crimes. The court's decision prioritized public safety due to the defendant's history of similar offenses.

Open Case as PDF

The Court Case

In 1985, a court decided not to let a person accused of drug crimes out on bail. The court worried about the safety of the public and the fact that people who commit drug crimes often do it again.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

166 Cal.App.3d 966 (1985)

Highlights