Resource Library
New to the Resource Library?
Learn how to navigate, search, and use our resources effectively.
Brief of Drug Policy Alliance as Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondent
The brief argues a law prohibiting "unlawful users" of controlled substances from possessing firearms is unconstitutionally vague.
Brief of Amicus Curiae Seattle Chapter National Lawyers Guild
This brief argues that forcing Ms. Kim to choose between a men's prison general population and solitary confinement violates her human rights. It asserts neither option meets minimum standards for dignified treatment.
Proposed Brief of Amici Curiae Drug Policy Alliance et al. in Support of Appellant’s Motion for Leave to Appeal to the Court of Appeals
This brief argues a father cannot be found negligent for his pregnant partner's drug use. Medical experts oppose punitive actions during pregnancy, citing harm to women, children, and families.
Brief of Amici Curiae New York Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union & Four Medical and Public Health Expertson Substance Use Disorder in Support of Respondent-Appellant Jorge C.
The brief argues a Family Court cannot condition parental rights on reducing methadone use without medical cause. It states terminating parental rights due to medication for opioid use disorder is discriminatory under the ADA.
Brief of Amici Curiae Social Science Researchers in Opposition to Defendants-Appellants’ Petition for Rehearing En Banc, Community Legal Services
This brief argues that unaccompanied migrant children are highly vulnerable and require legal representation. Eliminating funding for these services would inflict severe, lasting harm, which goes against public interest.
Brief of Amici Curiae Dr. Jack L. Turban and Dr. Lisa R. Fortuna in Support of Respondents
The brief argues that conversion efforts harm children, as supported by extensive peer-reviewed literature. Colorado's law appropriately bans these efforts while allowing explorative therapy and protecting religious freedom.
Brief of the American Psychological Association as Amicus Curiae in Support of Defendant-Appellant
The brief argues that suggestive procedures following an initial failure to identify a defendant contaminate memory. This defeats claims that later in-court identifications are from an independent source.
Brief of Amici Curiae Scholars on the Neurological Effects of Pornography on Adolescents in Support of Respondent
The brief argues adolescent brains are uniquely vulnerable to pornography's harms due to neuroplasticity and underdeveloped prefrontal cortices. It asserts protecting youth from addiction outweighs the industry's free speech rights.
Motion of Forty Developmental Science Scholars and Nonprofits for Leave to File Amicus Brief in Support of Appellants; Brief of Amici Curiae
This brief argues that mandatory life without parole sentences for 19- and 20-year-olds are unconstitutional. It claims these individuals share the same incomplete brain development as 18-year-olds, making such sentences disproportionate.
Amicus Curiae Brief of the Center for Law, Brain, and Behavior in Support of Appellant Evan McCarrick Jerald
This brief argues a 208-year sentence for a juvenile offender is excessive. It contends adolescent brain development and capacity for change, supported by scientific evidence, warrant different sentencing considerations.
Brief of Amici Curiae American Academy of Pediatric Neuropsychology, ACLU of New Jersey, Center for Juvenile Justice Reform, the Center for Law, Brain and Behavior, Gault Center, Juvenile Law Center, Pacific Juvenile Defender Center, & Sentencing Project
This brief argues that scientific findings show late adolescents (ages 18-20) share characteristics with younger teens, warranting similar protections against extreme sentences.
Brief of Amicus Curiae Drug Policy Alliance in Support of Petitioner
This brief argues that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3) is unconstitutionally vague. It claims the law fails to define "unlawful user" of controlled substances, creating unclear prohibitions and risking unfair prosecution for firearm possession.
Brief of Safe Living Space and Dr. Edie Zusman, MD, FAANS, as Amici Curiae in Support of the Petitioner
The brief argues for clarifying the "ongoing emergency" rule for 911 calls in domestic violence cases, especially when victims have head injuries. It seeks guidance on when victim statements are considered evidence for trial.
Brief of Center for Law, Brain and Behavior as Amicus Curiae in Support of Appellees-Plaintiffs Joao Neves, Keith Nunes, Pablo Ortega, and Mario Monteiro
This brief argues that Mario's Law should apply to all youth under 22 who have served 20 years, citing scientific evidence that adolescent brains continue to develop, making reliable predictions of future dangerousness impossible.
Brief of Amici Curiae Committee for Public Counsel Services, Massachusetts Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers
The brief argues that new scientific understanding of eyewitness memory is evidence warranting a review of past convictions. It explains how mistaken eyewitness testimony can unfairly influence a jury's view of other evidence.