Summary of Argument
The proposition of law presented by the amici curiae argues that courts should consider the scientific evidence surrounding adolescent brain development when determining constitutional limitations on juvenile sentencing. The argument rests on the premise that the human brain undergoes substantial structural, functional, and chemical transformations during adolescence, impacting decision-making, impulse control, and risk assessment.
Significant structural changes occur within the adolescent brain, including synaptic pruning, the elimination of unused neural connections, and myelination, the process of forming myelin sheaths around nerve fibers, which improves signal transmission. These structural modifications contribute to the brain's ongoing development and refinement.
Functionally, the adolescent brain experiences notable changes in executive function, reward processing, and socio-emotional cognition. Executive function, encompassing planning, decision-making, and self-regulation, continues to mature throughout adolescence. Reward processing, the brain's response to pleasurable stimuli, exhibits heightened sensitivity in adolescents compared to adults. Furthermore, socio-emotional cognition, the ability to understand and manage emotions, undergoes significant development during this period.
In terms of brain chemistry, adolescence is characterized by alterations in reward processing systems, particularly those involving dopamine, a neurotransmitter associated with pleasure and motivation. These chemical changes contribute to adolescents' heightened susceptibility to reward and their potential for impulsive behaviors.