Resource Library

Topics

Filters

Resource Library

New to the Resource Library?

Learn how to navigate, search, and use our resources effectively.

How to use the Library

Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal

The Court ruled that the religious use of a controlled substance was protected from federal prosecution under RFRA.

Religious Freedom Restoration ActRFRAreligious usecontrolled substancefederal prosecutionreligious exemption
(2006)

United States v. Georgia

The Court ruled the ADA applies to state prisons when constitutional rights are violated. This protects incarcerated individuals with disabilities, including those with substance use disorders.

ADATitle IIstate prisonssubstance use disorderdisability rights
(2006)

Gonzales v. Oregon

The Court held the Attorney General cannot ban doctors from prescribing drugs for state-authorized physician-assisted suicide. This ruling affirmed Oregon's right to allow the practice.

Controlled Substances Actphysician-assisted suicideprescription drugsstate-authorizeddoctors prescribing drugs
(2006)

Development of the Adolescent Brain: Implications for Executive Function and Social Cognition

Research indicates that the adolescent brain undergoes significant development. The prefrontal cortex shows increased myelination, enhancing neural transmission speed, and changes in synaptic density through proliferation and pruning.

Brain scans Teenagers Decision making Social policy Education
(2006)

Earlier Development of the Accumbens Relative to Orbitofrontal Cortex Might Underlie Risk-Taking Behavior in Adolescents

Adolescents show increased brain activity in reward-related regions and less mature activity in impulse control regions compared to children and adults. This may explain their heightened risk-taking behaviors.

accumbensadolescentrewarddevelopmentorbital frontal cortexrisk-taking
(2006)

Scarver v Litscher

Prison officials were not liable for an inmate's worsened mental illness after solitary confinement. The court found no deliberate indifference, as officials lacked clear prior knowledge of the specific harm.

Eighth Amendmentdeliberate indifferencesolitary confinementmental illnessschizophrenic inmateliability
(2006)

State v. Paiz

The court upheld testimony about PTSD symptoms after sexual abuse. It affirmed that qualified experts can explain treatment-based diagnoses.

treatment-based diagnosesreliable PTSD diagnosesqualified expertsPTSD testimonyPTSD symptomssexual abuseexpert testimony
(2006)

Commonwealth v. May

The court ruled it was an error to exclude evidence of the defendant's abusive childhood during sentencing. This evidence could have influenced the death penalty decision.

abusive childhoodpenalty phasemitigating circumstance death sentenceexcluding evidencecapital punishment
(2006)

Developmental trajectories of legal socialization among serious adolescent offenders

This study explores how adolescents develop beliefs about law and legal authorities. It examines legal socialization over time in young offenders to understand how these attitudes change from late adolescence to early adulthood.

legal socializationadolescencejuvenile offenders
(2005)

Greeno v. Daley

The court found that failing to treat an inmate's worsening ulcer and denying proper diet or specialist care could demonstrate deliberate indifference to serious medical needs.

Eighth Amendmentdeliberate indifferenceserious medical needsinmatemedical carespecialist care
(2005)

The Enduring Effects of Abuse and Related Adverse Experiences in Childhood: a Convergence of Evidence from Neurobiology and Epidemiology

Early life stress, such as abuse, can cause lasting changes in brain function and structure. These changes impact health and quality of life throughout a person's life.

Child developmentAdultsstressmental healthphysical healthdrug usedomestic violenceneurobiologychildhood abusesubstance
(2005)

Brief of Juvenile Law Center; The Center on Children and Families; The Central Juvenile Defender Center; The ChildLaw Center et al., as Amici Curiae in Support of the Respondent-Appellee

The EJJ provision is void for vagueness because it fails to adequately define prohibited conduct, harming youth and hindering effective rehabilitation. Separate hearings for EJJ and transfer motions also undermine juvenile court goals.

right to counselminorEJJExtended Juvenile JurisdictiontransferJuvenile Court Actvaguenessbrainadolescent developmentFifth Amendment (U.S.)neurological researchadolescent psychology
(2005)

Brief of Juvenile Law Center as Amicus Curiae in Support of Petitioner-Appellant

The petitioner argues ineffective counsel failed to suppress her confession. Counsel conceded voluntariness, despite police not advising the then 14-year-old she would be prosecuted as an adult.

cognitive capacityteenage braindevelopmentally distinctchildrenadolescentsdecision-makingdeveloping brainyouthinterrogationpolice questioningsentenced as an adultpsychological researchneurological researchadolescent developmentrisky behavioremotionally dependentprefrontal cortexfrontal lobeyoung adultconfessionsinvoluntary confessions
(2005)

Addiction Specialists, Inc. v. Township of Hampton

The Third Circuit ruled Hampton's zoning illegally excluded a methadone clinic, violating the ADA. The case was sent back for action to allow the clinic.

(2005)

Cognitive and Affective Development in Adolescence

Adolescence is a vulnerable period due to differing maturation rates of brain systems controlling emotion, behavior, and cognition. This creates risks and opportunities for reorganization of regulatory systems.

Teenagers Grow Develop Scientists Adolescent behavior Brain development Vulnerability Changes Reorganization Well-being
(2005)