Resource Library

Topics

Filters

Resource Library

New to the Resource Library?

Learn how to navigate, search, and use our resources effectively.

How to use the Library

Phillips v. Jasper County Jail

The court found jail staff may have ignored an inmate's seizure medication needs and bunk request, but dismissed claims against the jail doctor.

deliberate indifferencejail staffmedical negligencemalpractice
(2006)

Brief of Juvenile Law Center, et al in support Plaintiffs/Appellee's Petition for Rehearing En Banc

This brief argues that strip-searching juveniles for minor violations is unconstitutional. It claims the current policy misuses child-protective principles to justify traumatic searches that adults would not face.

youthFourth Amendment (U.S.)strip searchvulnerable youthjuvenilespsychological vulnerabilitytraumaadolescent developmentPTSDbody consciousness
(2006)

Brief of Amici Curiae Juvenile Law Center, et al. in Support of Appellant Corey Spears

Waiver of legal counsel in delinquency cases jeopardizes a youth's fundamental rights and creates serious lifelong consequences. Parents cannot serve as effective legal counsel due to potential conflicts of interest.

right to counseldelinquency proceedingyouthconflict of interestauthority figuresinterrogationvulnerabilityimmaturity
(2006)

Wisconsin Community Services v. City of Milwaukee

The court ruled cities cannot discriminate against mental health and addiction centers when issuing special-use permits. These centers are entitled to reasonable accommodation under federal law.

municipal special-use permitsdiscriminationmental health treatment centersaddiction treatment centersreasonable accommodationADA
(2006)

Davis v. Carter

The Seventh Circuit ruled that Cook County’s repeated delays in providing methadone to an inmate could demonstrate deliberate indifference, equating delay with denial of care for a serious medical need.

methadoneinmatedeliberate indifferencedenial of careserious medical need
(2006)

Gonzales v. O Centro Espírita Beneficente União do Vegetal

The Court ruled that the religious use of a controlled substance was protected from federal prosecution under RFRA.

Religious Freedom Restoration ActRFRAreligious usecontrolled substancefederal prosecutionreligious exemption
(2006)

United States v. Georgia

The Court ruled the ADA applies to state prisons when constitutional rights are violated. This protects incarcerated individuals with disabilities, including those with substance use disorders.

ADATitle IIstate prisonssubstance use disorderdisability rights
(2006)

Gonzales v. Oregon

The Court held the Attorney General cannot ban doctors from prescribing drugs for state-authorized physician-assisted suicide. This ruling affirmed Oregon's right to allow the practice.

Controlled Substances Actphysician-assisted suicideprescription drugsstate-authorizeddoctors prescribing drugs
(2006)

Development of the Adolescent Brain: Implications for Executive Function and Social Cognition

Research indicates that the adolescent brain undergoes significant development. The prefrontal cortex shows increased myelination, enhancing neural transmission speed, and changes in synaptic density through proliferation and pruning.

Brain scans Teenagers Decision making Social policy Education
(2006)

Earlier Development of the Accumbens Relative to Orbitofrontal Cortex Might Underlie Risk-Taking Behavior in Adolescents

Adolescents show increased brain activity in reward-related regions and less mature activity in impulse control regions compared to children and adults. This may explain their heightened risk-taking behaviors.

accumbensadolescentrewarddevelopmentorbital frontal cortexrisk-taking
(2006)

Scarver v Litscher

Prison officials were not liable for an inmate's worsened mental illness after solitary confinement. The court found no deliberate indifference, as officials lacked clear prior knowledge of the specific harm.

Eighth Amendmentdeliberate indifferencesolitary confinementmental illnessschizophrenic inmateliability
(2006)

State v. Paiz

The court upheld testimony about PTSD symptoms after sexual abuse. It affirmed that qualified experts can explain treatment-based diagnoses.

treatment-based diagnosesreliable PTSD diagnosesqualified expertsPTSD testimonyPTSD symptomssexual abuseexpert testimony
(2006)

Commonwealth v. May

The court ruled it was an error to exclude evidence of the defendant's abusive childhood during sentencing. This evidence could have influenced the death penalty decision.

abusive childhoodpenalty phasemitigating circumstance death sentenceexcluding evidencecapital punishment
(2006)

Developmental trajectories of legal socialization among serious adolescent offenders

This study explores how adolescents develop beliefs about law and legal authorities. It examines legal socialization over time in young offenders to understand how these attitudes change from late adolescence to early adulthood.

legal socializationadolescencejuvenile offenders
(2005)

Greeno v. Daley

The court found that failing to treat an inmate's worsening ulcer and denying proper diet or specialist care could demonstrate deliberate indifference to serious medical needs.

Eighth Amendmentdeliberate indifferenceserious medical needsinmatemedical carespecialist care
(2005)