Resource Library

Topics

Filters

Clear Filters

Resource Library

New to the Resource Library?

Learn how to navigate, search, and use our resources effectively.

How to use the Library

Jones v. Mississippi

The Supreme Court ruled that a life-without-parole sentence for a juvenile offender does not require a separate finding of permanent incorrigibility. Judges can consider age along with other factors in sentencing.

juvenile LWOPlife without parolejuvenile offendersMiller v. Alabamamandatory sentencingEighth Amendment (U.S.)cruel and unusual punishmentMississippi Supreme Courtpermanent incorrigibilityU.S. Supreme Court

Roper v. Simmons

The Supreme Court ruled that executing minors is unconstitutional, violating the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. The decision cited evolving standards, juvenile brain development, and potential for rehabilitation.

death penaltyLWOPjuvenile justiceEighth Amendment (U.S.)cruel and unusual punishmentcapital punishmentdeath penalty for juveniles

DeMola v. Cavazos

The court upheld a juvenile murder conviction, finding proper grounds to remove a juror. It noted the life without parole sentence considered mitigating factors and allowed for future review.

individual sentencingjuvenile justiceLWOPjuvenile life without parolejuvenile sentencing

Banks v. People

The Colorado Supreme Court remanded a juvenile life without parole sentence after Miller v. Alabama. The trial court must determine if life without parole is still appropriate; otherwise, life with parole applies.

LWOPjuvenile sentencingEighth Amendment (U.S.)cruel and unusual punishmentjuvenile offendersretroactive application

Commonwealth v. Brown

The court ruled mandatory life without parole for juveniles is unconstitutional, applying a U.S. Supreme Court decision to a 17-year-old convicted of murder. It also reviewed his statements to police.

LWOPjuvenile justicefelony murder ruleaccomplice liabilityMiller v. AlabamaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court juvenile offendersMiranda rights

Falcon v. State

The Florida Supreme Court ruled that mandatory life without parole sentences for juvenile homicide offenders are unconstitutional and apply retroactively. This decision ensures resentencing hearings consider the offender's youth.

retroactive application of MillerMiller v. AlabamaLWOPmandatory life sentenceEighth Amendment (U.S.)cruel and unusual punishment

Henry v. State

The Florida Supreme Court overturned a juvenile offender's life sentence for sexual battery, ruling it unconstitutional. The sentence denied a meaningful chance for release based on maturity and reform.

juvenile LWOPEighth Amendment (U.S.)cruel and unusual punishmentGraham v. Floridameaningful opportunity for releasejuvenile resentencing

Baines v. Pennsylvania

The court allowed Franklin Baines to file a new petition challenging his life sentence as a juvenile. This followed a Supreme Court ruling that mandatory life sentences for juveniles are unconstitutional.

LWOPjuvenile life without parolePennsylvania Superior Court post-conviction reliefsuppression of evidencesearch and seizureFourth Amendment (U.S.)Eighth Amendment (U.S.)

Commonwealth v. Brooker

The court upheld Michael Brooker's murder conviction. Witness testimony identifying Brooker as a shooter in the death of Barry Jacobs Jr. in Philadelphia was deemed credible and sufficient evidence.

Pennsylvania Superior Courtmandatory LWOP as unconstitutionaljuvenile LWOPfirst/second degree murdermandatory minimum sentences

Commonwealth v. Cunningham

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled that Miller v. Alabama, which ended mandatory juvenile life sentences without parole, applies retroactively. This means Ian Cunningham's life sentence, imposed as a juvenile, must be reviewed.

juvenile LWOPEighth Amendment (U.S.)cruel and unusual punishmentretroactive application of MillerMiller v. Alabamamandatory minimum sentencingPennsylvania Supreme Court individualised sentencing

People v. Caballero

The California Supreme Court ruled that a 110-year sentence for a juvenile offender violated the Eighth Amendment. The Court stated such a sentence denied the possibility of rehabilitation.

juvenile offendercruel and unusual punishmentEighth Amendment (U.S.)rehabilitation for juveniles juvenile sentencingLWOP

Diatchenko v. District Attorney for Suffolk District

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that mandatory life without parole for juveniles is unconstitutional cruel punishment. The Court cited juveniles' lesser culpability and need for rehabilitation as reasons.

juvenile LWOPjuvenile justicecruel and unusual punishmentEighth Amendment (U.S.)Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusettssentencing discretionjuvenile homiciderehabilitation for juveniles

Graham v. Florida

The Supreme Court held that sentencing juveniles to life without parole for non-murder crimes violates the Eighth Amendment. This ruling recognized juveniles' capacity for reform and development.

Juvenile offendersEighth Amendment (U.S.)LWOPCruel and unusual punishmentRehabilitation of juveniles

In re Monschke

The Washington Supreme Court ruled that mandatory life without parole for offenders under 21 is cruel punishment. Scientific evidence on brain development shows young people are less culpable.

mandatory LWOPjuvenile justicejuvenile life without paroleEighth Amendment (U.S.)cruel and unusual punishmentWashington State Supreme Courtjudicial discretion in sentencingbrain development in young offendersadolescent brain developmentneuroscience

Brief of Juvenile Law Center, National Juvenile Defender Center, Children and Family Justice Center, et al. as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners

Petitioners argue that life without parole for non-homicide crimes committed by minors is unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment, citing youth's unique characteristics and capacity for change.

LWOPchildrenyouthadolescencecapacity for rehabilitationEighth Amendment (U.S.)developmental statusdiminished culpabilitydiminished responsibilitylesser blameworthiness
1...545556...62