Resource Library

Topics

Filters

Select a Year Range
Clear Filters

Resource Library

New to the Resource Library?

Learn how to navigate, search, and use our resources effectively.

How to use the Library

Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. Smith

The Supreme Court ruled that neutral laws prohibiting peyote use are valid even when it is used for religious purposes, narrowing Free Exercise rights.

peyoteFree Exercise Clausereligious freedomreligious usedrug useneutral lawsFirst Amendment
(1990)

US v. Desurra

The court upheld a drug distribution conviction. It found methamphetamine intoxication did not negate the specific intent needed for the federal offense.

drug distributionmethamphetamine intoxicationspecific intentfederal offense
(1989)

People v. Reyes

The court upheld a drug possession conviction. Large drug quantities, packaging, and cash provided sufficient evidence of intent to sell.

(1987)

Grinspoon v. Drug Enforcement Admin.

The court ordered the DEA to reconsider marijuana's Schedule I classification. The DEA improperly excluded scientific evidence about its medical uses during the initial review.

DEAscientific evidencemarijuana Schedule I statusmedical useclassification
(1987)

US v. Caudle

The Fifth Circuit dismissed MDMA indictments because the DEA did not follow proper procedures when temporarily listing the drug as a Schedule I controlled substance.

MDMADEASchedule Iproceduresindictments
(1987)

State v. Fox

The Utah Supreme Court upheld Gary Fox's marijuana conviction but reversed Clive Fox's due to a lack of evidence.

marijuana cultivationmarijuana distributioninsufficient evidencedrug conviction
(1985)

In re Handa

The court upheld denying bail to a narcotics defendant due to public safety concerns. The ruling cited patterns of drug-related recidivism.

bailnarcoticsdefendantpublic safetydrug-relatedrecidivism
(1985)

People v. Stout

criminal caseevidencehearsaydue processlegal precedent
(1985)

United States v. Lyons

The court rejected drug addiction alone as an insanity defense. It narrowed the legal standard, requiring an inability to appreciate wrongfulness, not to control one's actions.

Insanity defensedrug addictionfederal caselegal standardinability to appreciate wrongfulnesslack of controlLyons casecriminal responsibilityaddiction as defensewrongfulness
(1984)

Wellman v. Faulkner

The prison's overcrowding and infrequent medical care violated the Eighth Amendment. This showed deliberate indifference, requiring remedies and damages.

(1983)

United States v. Place

The Supreme Court ruled that seizing luggage for an extended time without probable cause is unconstitutional. A brief dog sniff, however, is not considered a search.

probable causeseizureluggageunreasonable seizuredog
(1983)

People v. Cardenas

The California Supreme Court ruled that evidence of a defendant's friends' drug use was unfairly prejudicial and could not be admitted in court. This decision affirmed fair trial protections.

prejudicial evidenceinadmissible evidencefair trialdefendantdrug useevidence admissibility
(1982)

Rhodes v. Chapman

The Supreme Court ruled that prison conditions violate the Eighth Amendment only if they inflict unnecessary pain or are grossly disproportionate to the crime.

prison conditionsEighth Amendmentunnecessary painwanton paindisproportionatecrime severity
(1981)

Inmates of Allegheny Cty. Jail v. Pierce

The court found potential constitutional violations in a jail's psychiatric care due to inadequate staffing. It upheld bans on contact visits and methadone for pretrial detainees.

pretrial detaineesjail conditionscontact visitsmethadonepsychiatric careconstitutional violationsinadequate staffingfederal casecourt rulingremanded
(1979)

Bell v. Wolfish

The Supreme Court ruled pretrial detainees cannot be punished before conviction. However, restrictions reasonably related to legitimate government objectives are not considered punishment.

Due Process Clausepretrial detaineespunishmentconvictionrestrictions
(1979)
1...171819...22