Resource Library

Topics

Filters

Select a Year Range
Clear Filters

Resource Library

New to the Resource Library?

Learn how to navigate, search, and use our resources effectively.

How to use the Library

US v. Montgomery

The court ruled the government failed to prove Kevin Montgomery was sexually dangerous. His cocaine use disorder was not a serious mental illness justifying civil commitment.

sexual dangerousnesscivil commitmentcocaine use disordermental illness
(2018)

Moore v. Texas

The Supreme Court ruled Texas violated the 8th Amendment by using outdated medical standards for intellectual disability in death penalty cases, rejecting current diagnostic criteria.

8th Amendmentintellectual disabilityDSM-5medical diagnostic standardsmedical standards
(2017)

Covington v. State

The court upheld Edward Covington's death sentences for murder. His claims of bipolar disorder and cocaine abuse were rejected, as voluntary drug use diminished mitigation.

death sentencemurderbipolar disordercocaine usemitigation
(2017)

Commonwealth v. Henry

The SJC ruled judges must consider a defendant's ability to pay restitution and cannot extend probation due to poverty. This reasoning has been used to challenge mandatory abstinence conditions.

restitutionprobationpovertyindigent defendantsprobation conditions
(2016)

Marshall v. Eyecare Specialties, P.C. of Lincoln

The Nebraska Supreme Court found alcoholism can be a disability under state law. However, the employee's firing was upheld, as it was due to performance, not her addiction.

alcoholismdisabilityemployerfiredaddictionperformance issuesemployee
(2016)

Pollard v. Drummond

The court found that firing a coal miner for prescribed methadone use, without assessing his individual risk, might be disability discrimination. This raised questions about whether he posed a direct threat.

ADAmethadoneemployment discriminationdirect threat
(2015)

McFadden v. United States

The Supreme Court ruled the government must prove a defendant knew a substance was controlled to prosecute under the Analogue Act.

controlled substancedrug prosecutioncriminal lawmens rea
(2015)

Cannabis Action Coalition v. City of Kent

The court affirmed Kent's ban on medical cannabis collective gardens, holding that state zoning law does not preempt municipal authority to regulate them.

medical cannabiszoningmunicipal bans
(2015)

US v. Kamper

The Sixth Circuit ruled that drug addiction alone does not justify a lighter sentence for child pornography distribution. The court found addiction insufficient grounds for a downward variance.

downward variancedrug addictionleniencysentencingchild pornography distribution
(2014)

Kosilek v. Spencer

The court ruled a serious medical need can be a future harm risk, but found no indifference as staff reasonably offered alternative care.

deliberate indifferenceserious medical needprison staffrisk managementfuture harm
(2014)

Alvarado v. Westchester County

The court partly upheld claims from Westchester inmates alleging forced cold-turkey heroin withdrawal without medication violated their rights. Claims against Smithson and the Monell claim can proceed.

heroin withdrawalcold-turkeymethadoneSuboxonerights violationMonell claimEighth Amendment
(2014)

Lebron v. Secretary of the Florida Department of Children and Families

The court blocked Florida's law requiring suspicionless drug tests for welfare applicants. It found no special need to justify invading privacy without cause.

drug testingTANF4th Amendmentpreliminary injunctionwelfare
(2013)

De'lonta v. Johnson

The court found a transgender inmate could sue prison officials for denying gender-affirming surgery evaluation. Officials ignored medical standards despite a serious self-harm risk.

Transgender inmateEighth Amendmentprison officialsmedical standardsgender confirmation surgerydenial of careaccess to care
(2013)

People v. Davis

The court upheld a conviction for MDMA possession and sale. It used scientific treatises to classify the substance, even without expert testimony.

MDMApossessionsaleexpert testimonyscientific treatises
(2013)

Florida v. Harris

The Supreme Court ruled a reliable alert from a certified drug-sniffing dog creates probable cause for a search. This upholds such searches under the Fourth Amendment.

probable causedrug-sniffing dogsearch and seizure reasonable suspicionevidence
(2013)
1...111213...22