Cannabis Action Coalition v. City of Kent
SimpleOriginal

Summary

In this 2015 case, the court held that Washington’s zoning statute does not preempt municipal bans on medical cannabis collective gardens, affirming that Kent could bar them under MUCA authority.

2015 | State Juristiction

Cannabis Action Coalition v. City of Kent

Keywords Washington zoning statute; medical cannabis; municipal bans; medical cannabis collective gardens; Kent; MUCA; 2015 case; preempt; zoning; cannabis
Open Case as PDF

Case Summary

The 2015 ruling established that Washington State's zoning law does not supersede local ordinances prohibiting medical cannabis collective cultivation. The court upheld the municipality of Kent's authority to ban such operations under the state's Municipal Utilities and Community Affairs Act (MUCA).

Open Case as PDF

2015 Case: Municipal Authority over Medical Cannabis

The 2015 court decision upheld the right of municipalities to prohibit medical cannabis collective gardens, even in the presence of state zoning statutes. The ruling confirmed that Kent's ban on such gardens was permissible under the state's Medical Use of Cannabis Act (MUCA). The court found no conflict between the state's zoning law and the city's ability to regulate medical cannabis cultivation within its jurisdiction.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

In a 2015 ruling, the court decided that Washington state's zoning laws didn't override local rules against medical marijuana growing collectives. The court confirmed that the city of Kent had the right to prohibit these collectives.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

In 2015, a court decided that a Washington state law about land use didn't stop cities from banning places where people could grow medical marijuana together. The court said a city called Kent could ban these gardens.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

351 P.3d 151 (2015)

Highlights