Resource Library
People v. Victor
Keywords narcotics conviction; entrapment; drug conviction; drug-seeking behavior; prior drug use(1965)
Brown v. United States
Keywords Insanity defense; narcotics charges; addiction; court assistance; legal aid; D.C. Circuit; reversed and remanded; drug addiction defense; mental health defense; criminal appeal(1964)
Castle v. United States
Keywords Insanity defense; duress; addiction; criminal responsibility; legal insanity; D.C. Circuit; jury; conviction; appeal; affirmation(1964)
People v. Ortiz
Keywords heroin conviction; police entry; legal justification; illegal search and seizure; due process; exclusionary rule; Fourth Amendment(1964)
In re De La O
Keywords narcotic addict; civil commitment; drug users; treatment; chronic drug use; punishment(1963)
Robinson v. California
Keywords 8th Amendment; 14th Amendment; addiction; criminalizing addiction(1962)
Ashcraft v. Tennessee
(1944)
Buck v. Bell
Keywords Virginia; forced sterilization; constitutionality; intellectual disability; incorrigibility(1927)
Linder v. United States
Keywords medical practice; addiction treatment; Harrison Narcotics Act(1925)
United States v. Behrman
Keywords Harrison Narcotics Act; morphine; addict; prescribing; criminal intent; bad faith(1922)
Webb v. United States
Keywords maintenance; medical practice; addiction treatment; Harrison Narcotics Act(1919)
United States v. Doremus
Keywords Harrison Narcotics Act; opioid distribution; taxation(1919)
A Review of Arguments for Raising the Age of Criminal Responsibility
Keywords Age of criminal responsibility; Content analysis; MACR; Youth justice
The developmental timing but not magnitude of adolescent risk-taking propensity is consistent across social, environmental, and psychological factors
Keywords Adolescence; Risk-taking; National survey; Generalizability; Reproducibility; sensation seeking; substance use
Distorted Burden Shifting & Barred Mitigation: Being a Stubborn 234 Years Old Ironically Hasn’t Helped the Supreme Court Mature
Keywords Capital Punishment; Adverse Childhood Experiences; Mitigation; Health Law; Criminal Procedure; Criminal Law; Biopsychosocial Development; United States Supreme Court