Resource Library

Topics

Filters

Clear Filters

Resource Library

New to the Resource Library?

Learn how to navigate, search, and use our resources effectively.

How to use the Library

Hobbs v. Gordon

The Arkansas Supreme Court affirmed that Miller v. Alabama, which bars mandatory life without parole for juveniles, applies retroactively. This ruling upheld the decision to grant Ulonzo Gordon relief from his juvenile life sentence.

Miller v. AlabamaEighth Amendment (U.S.)cruel and unusual punishmentequal protection violationFourteenth Amendment (U.S.)Arkansas Supreme Court

Layman v. State

The Indiana Supreme Court reversed felony murder convictions for two juveniles. It found the evidence insufficient and facts differed from previous cases, remanding for new proceedings.

juvenile offendersIndiana Supreme Courtfelony murderadolescent brain sciencejuvenile justice

State v. Soto

The court ruled that mandatory life without parole for juveniles is unconstitutional. This applied retroactively, allowing re-sentencing for those convicted as teenagers like Michael Soto.

Eighth Amendment (U.S.)juvenile justiceLWOPjuvenile life without parolejuvenile offenderscruel and unusual punishmentretroactive application of Miller

Jones v. Commonwealth

The court ruled that a juvenile's life sentence without parole was permissible because Virginia's law allowed some parole possibility, differing from the mandatory sentences restricted by *Miller v. Alabama*.

juvenile LWOPEighth Amendment (U.S.)cruel and unusual punishmentjuvenile justicejuvenile offendersretroactive applicationMiller v. AlabamaVirginia Supreme Court

People v. Palafox

The Court of Appeal overturned a gang-related probation condition for a 16-year-old convicted of murder. It found no evidence linking gang activity to the crime or rehabilitation needs.

juvenile offenderprobation conditionsjuvenile LWOPjuvenile resentencing

People v. Vigil

The Colorado Supreme Court ruled that Miller v. Alabama, banning mandatory life without parole for juveniles, does not apply retroactively to cases already finalized, upholding Vigil's sentence.

juvenile life without paroleLWOPMiller v. Alabamaretroactive application of Millermandatory LWOP

Songster v. Beard

The court sent a juvenile lifer's case back to reconsider his sentence after a Supreme Court ruling banned mandatory life without parole for minors. The court did not decide if the new rule applied retroactively.

juvenile life without paroleLWOPMiller v. Alabamaretroactive application of Millercruel and unusual punishmentEighth Amendment (U.S.)

State v. Moore

The Ohio Supreme Court upheld a lengthy sentence for a juvenile convicted of violent crimes. The court ruled the sentence, though long, did not violate the Eighth Amendment as it allowed for eventual release.

Eighth Amendment (U.S.)cruel and unusual punishmentjuvenile sentencingaggregate sentenceOhio Supreme Courtmandatory life without parole

State v. Mares

The Wyoming Supreme Court found that a juvenile life without parole sentence was unconstitutional. However, changes in state law already made the defendant eligible for parole, making the specific challenge moot.

LWOPfirst-degree murderretroactive application of Miller Miller v. Alabamacruel and unusual punishmentEighth Amendment (U.S.)juvenile justiceWyoming Supreme Courtjuvenile life without parole

People v. Carp

The Michigan Supreme Court ruled Miller v. Alabama, which banned mandatory juvenile life without parole, was not retroactive. It also affirmed that such sentences are not categorically barred by the Eighth Amendment or Michigan law.

child convicted of murderindividualised sentence LWOPretroactive application of MillerMiller v. AlabamaEighth Amendment (U.S.)juvenile offenderscruel and unusual punishmentMichigan Constitutionsentencing guidelines

Martin v. Symmes

The court ruled that Miller v. Alabama, which banned mandatory juvenile life without parole, does not apply retroactively. This prevented Martin from challenging his prior Minnesota sentence.

juvenile resentencingLWOPEighth Amendment (U.S.)juvenile justicecruel and unusual punishmentjuvenile offendersMiller v. Alabamahabeas corpus8th Circuit Court of Appealsretroactive application

Bowen v. Kendrick

The Supreme Court upheld federal funding for adolescent pregnancy prevention programs, ruling they served a secular purpose despite religious organization involvement. The Court found no unconstitutional establishment of religion.

teenage pregnancyright to abortionright to abortion for youth

In re Gault

The Supreme Court ruled that juveniles facing delinquency charges have fundamental due process rights, including notice, counsel, and protection against self-incrimination. This 15-year-old’s case established key protections for youth.

juvenile justicejuvenile rightsdue processconstitutional guaranteesFourteenth Amendment (U.S.)

J.D.B. v. North Carolina

The Supreme Court held a child's age is a factor in determining if they are in police custody for Miranda warnings. A 14-year-old was questioned without warnings and confessed.

interrogation of youthMirandapolice custodyFifth Amendment (U.S.) Miranda warningsjuvenile interrogation

Miller v. Alabama

The Supreme Court ruled mandatory life without parole sentences for juveniles convicted of murder are unconstitutional. Judges must now consider a juvenile's age and background before sentencing.

mandatory life without parolejuvenile LWOPindividualised sentence hearingEighth Amendment (U.S.)cruel and unusual punishmentjuvenile justice
1...535455...62