Resource Library

Topics

Filters

Clear Filters

Resource Library

New to the Resource Library?

Learn how to navigate, search, and use our resources effectively.

How to use the Library

Kedrowitz v. State

The court affirmed a 100-year sentence for a 13-year-old who killed his siblings. It found the defendant competent and the sentence not cruel or unusual, despite arguments about his youth.

LWOPdevelopmental differencesneuroscientific research

People v. Hardin

The California Supreme Court upheld a life without parole sentence for a 25-year-old. The court found no equal protection violation in denying parole opportunities available to younger offenders.

early releaseLWOPjuvenile life without paroleCalifornia Supreme Courtyoung offender

Commonwealth v. King

The court denied King’s appeal to overturn a previous order. He sought post-conviction relief regarding his original case.

de facto life sentenceLWOPjuvenile life without paroleresentencing hearing potential for rehabilitation of juvenilesPennsylvania Post-Conviction Relief ActMiller v. Alabamaretroactive application of Miller

People v. Taylor

The Michigan Supreme Court held that mandatory life without parole for juveniles is unconstitutional and applies retroactively. Robert Taylor's case was sent back for resentencing to consider his youth.

juvenile resentencingLWOPMiller v. Alabamajuvenile life without paroleMichigan Supreme Court

People v. Paredes

A 17-year-old convicted of murder challenged his mandatory life sentence. The court upheld it, citing his leadership and efforts to hide evidence, despite a ruling against such sentences for juveniles.

LWOPjuvenile life without paroleMiller v. AlabamaMichigan Court of Appeals

Montgomery v. Louisiana

The Supreme Court ruled that a previous ban on mandatory life without parole for juveniles applies retroactively. Henry Montgomery, sentenced as a 17-year-old, gained a chance for resentencing with parole.

death penaltyLWOPcruel and unusual punishmentretroactive applicationEighth Amendment (U.S.)juvenile life without paroleMiller v. Alabama

Hartigan v. Zbaraz

The Illinois Parental Notice Abortion Act, requiring minors to notify a parent before an abortion, was found unconstitutional. A federal court ruled the waiting period and judicial bypass procedures created an undue burden.

mandatory waiting periodsabortion procedure for minorsparental notificationabortion

People v. Rainer

The Colorado Supreme Court upheld a juvenile’s 40-year sentence. The court found that Miller v. Alabama, which banned mandatory life without parole for juveniles, did not apply to a long term-of-years sentence.

juvenile LWOPEighth Amendment (U.S.)Miller v. Alabamaineligibility for paroleaggregate sentence

People v. Ybanez

The court upheld a juvenile's murder conviction and life sentence. It found no Sixth Amendment violation from a potential conflict of interest, nor a right to a guardian ad litem under state law.

guardian ad litemjuvenile offenderLWOPjuvenile life without paroleyouth tried as an adultmurder conviction

People v. Walker

The Illinois Appellate Court upheld a life sentence without parole for a 17-year-old convicted of felony murder. The court found the sentence was not mandatory and therefore did not violate state or federal proportionate penalties clauses.

LWOPIllinois ConstitutionMiller v. Alabama juvenile life without parolecruel and unusual punishmentEighth Amendment (U.S.)Proportionate Penalties Clause

Watson v. Illinois

The court affirmed Kevin Watson's murder and aggravated vehicular hijacking convictions and sentences. Watson was found guilty of first-degree murder and aggravated vehicular hijacking, receiving consecutive sentences totaling 60 years.

State of Illinoisaggravated vehicular hijackingyouth tried as an adultfirst-degree murder

Estrada-Huerta v. People

The Colorado Supreme Court ruled a juvenile's lengthy, consecutive sentences for kidnapping and sexual assault are not life without parole, as he remains eligible for parole.

juvenile offender sentencingjuvenile LWOPColorado Supreme Courtparole eligibilityconsecutive sentences

Armstrong v. People

The Court found a 96-year sentence for a 16-year-old murder accomplice constitutional. Her sentence, though lengthy, offered parole eligibility, providing a meaningful chance for release.

juvenile offenderparole eligibilityEighth Amendment (U.S.)cruel and unusual punishmentmeaningful opportunity for releaseColorado Supreme Courtsecond-degree murder

Lucero v. People

The Colorado Supreme Court upheld a juvenile's lengthy sentence, finding it was not cruel and unusual punishment. The court distinguished it from life without parole, noting parole eligibility technically existed.

juvenile LWOPEighth Amendment (U.S.)cruel and unusual punishmentconsecutive sentencingright to rehabilitationparole eligibilityjuvenile justice

Martinez v. United States of America

The court held juvenile life sentences for RICO convictions were not restricted by new Supreme Court rulings. This was because the convictions included various crimes, not just murder.

juvenile life sentenceRICO ActRICO-murderretroactive application of new law
1...525354...62