Resource Library

Topics

Filters

Select a Year Range
Clear Filters

Resource Library

New to the Resource Library?

Learn how to navigate, search, and use our resources effectively.

How to use the Library

Grinspoon v. Drug Enforcement Admin.

The court ordered the DEA to reconsider marijuana's Schedule I classification. The DEA improperly excluded scientific evidence about its medical uses during the initial review.

DEAscientific evidencemarijuana Schedule I statusmedical useclassification
(1987)

US v. Caudle

The Fifth Circuit dismissed MDMA indictments because the DEA did not follow proper procedures when temporarily listing the drug as a Schedule I controlled substance.

MDMADEASchedule Iproceduresindictments
(1987)

State v. R.G.D.

The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled that judges must consider both aggravating and mitigating factors for juveniles convicted of serious crimes. Sentencing should be individualized, considering the crime, prior record, and other factors.

juvenile sentencingaggravating factorsmitigating factorsindividualized sentencing
(1987)

W.M.F. v. Alaska

The court affirmed an adult murder conviction for a juvenile. Evidence supported the finding that the juvenile would not be amenable to treatment before age 20.

juvenile sentencingdue processamenabilitywaiver to adult court
(1986)

Rock v. State

The Alaska Supreme Court ruled hypnotically refreshed testimony inadmissible. Hypnosis can distort memory, create false recollections, and undermine cross-examination.

Hypnotically refreshed testimonyinadmissiblehypnosisdistort memoryfalse recollectionsinaccurate memoriescross-examinationmemory distortion
(1986)

State v. Fox

The Utah Supreme Court upheld Gary Fox's marijuana conviction but reversed Clive Fox's due to a lack of evidence.

marijuana cultivationmarijuana distributioninsufficient evidencedrug conviction
(1985)

In re Handa

The court upheld denying bail to a narcotics defendant due to public safety concerns. The ruling cited patterns of drug-related recidivism.

bailnarcoticsdefendantpublic safetydrug-relatedrecidivism
(1985)

People v. Stout

criminal caseevidencehearsaydue processlegal precedent
(1985)

Hill v. Lockhart

The Court ruled the Strickland test for ineffective counsel applies to guilty pleas. A defendant must prove their attorney made serious errors and they would have chosen trial instead; Hill did not prove this.

(1985)

United States v. Lyons

The court rejected drug addiction alone as an insanity defense. It narrowed the legal standard, requiring an inability to appreciate wrongfulness, not to control one's actions.

Insanity defensedrug addictionfederal caselegal standardinability to appreciate wrongfulnesslack of controlLyons casecriminal responsibilityaddiction as defensewrongfulness
(1984)

People v. Bledsoe

The court ruled expert testimony on rape trauma syndrome cannot prove a rape occurred.

inadmissibilityexpert testimonyrape trauma syndrome
(1984)

Wellman v. Faulkner

The prison's overcrowding and infrequent medical care violated the Eighth Amendment. This showed deliberate indifference, requiring remedies and damages.

(1983)

United States v. Place

The Supreme Court ruled that seizing luggage for an extended time without probable cause is unconstitutional. A brief dog sniff, however, is not considered a search.

probable causeseizureluggageunreasonable seizuredog
(1983)

Eddings v. Oklahoma

The Supreme Court ruled courts must consider all mitigating factors, like a troubled childhood, when sentencing someone to death. This reversed a death sentence for a 16-year-old whose abuse was ignored.

Eighth Amendmentmitigating factorsdeath penaltycapital crimejuvenile sentencing
(1982)

People v. Cardenas

The California Supreme Court ruled that evidence of a defendant's friends' drug use was unfairly prejudicial and could not be admitted in court. This decision affirmed fair trial protections.

prejudicial evidenceinadmissible evidencefair trialdefendantdrug useevidence admissibility
(1982)