US v. Chowdhury
SimpleOriginal

Summary

In this 2011 case, the Second Circuit ruled that the defendant’s past drug use did not lessen his accountability for a complex Medicare fraud scheme, affirming his sentence due to the operation’s scope and impact.

2011 | Federal Juristiction

US v. Chowdhury

Keywords Medicare fraud; sentence; drug use
Open Case as PDF

Summary

In a 2011 judicial proceeding, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals determined that a defendant's history of substance use did not reduce his responsibility for an elaborate Medicare fraud scheme. The court upheld the imposed sentence, citing the extensive nature and far-reaching consequences of the illicit operation.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

In a 2011 ruling, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals determined that a defendant's prior drug use did not reduce responsibility for a complex Medicare fraud scheme. The court upheld the imposed sentence, noting the broad scope and significant impact of the fraudulent activities.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

In 2011, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals decided that a defendant's previous drug use did not excuse his role in a complicated Medicare fraud scheme. The court confirmed his sentence because of how large the fraud was and its significant effects.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

In a court case from 2011, a court decided that a person's past drug use did not make him less responsible. This was for a big plan to cheat Medicare, a government health program. The court agreed with his punishment because the cheating was so large and affected many people.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

639 F.3d 583 (2011)

Highlights