United States v. Chen
SimpleOriginal

Summary

In this 2022 case, the Ninth Circuit ruled that post-conviction sentencing discretion remains when statutory reforms render the original sentence unjust—even absent retroactive law changes.

2022 | Federal Juristiction

United States v. Chen

Keywords Ninth Circuit; post-conviction; sentencing discretion; statutory reforms; unjust sentence; retroactive law changes; 2022 case
Open Case as PDF

Summary

A 2022 ruling by the Ninth Circuit determined that judges retain the authority to modify sentences after a conviction. This discretion applies when new laws indicate that an original sentence is unjust, even if these new laws do not explicitly apply to cases decided in the past.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

A 2022 ruling by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals clarified that courts retain the authority to modify a sentence after a conviction. This discretion applies when legal reforms cause the original sentence to appear unfair, even if these new laws do not officially apply to past cases.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

In a 2022 court decision, the Ninth Circuit ruled on the ability to change a person's sentence after a conviction. The court determined that judges keep the power to modify a sentence, even when new laws make the original sentence appear unfair. This applies even if these new laws do not directly change past cases.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

In 2022, a court made a ruling about sentences. The court decided that judges can still change a person's sentence, even after they have been found guilty. This can happen if new laws make the first sentence seem unfair. It is true even if the new laws do not usually apply to older cases.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

48 F.4th 1092 (9th Cir. 2022)

Highlights