Summary
In 1985, the Utah Supreme Court issued a ruling concerning two separate cases involving individuals with the surname Fox. The Court affirmed the conviction of Gary Fox for offenses related to marijuana cultivation and distribution. Conversely, the conviction of Clive Fox was overturned by the same court, as it was determined there was insufficient evidence to establish his culpability or connection to the illicit operation.
Summary
In a 1985 decision, the Utah Supreme Court confirmed the conviction of Gary Fox for the cultivation and distribution of marijuana. However, the court reversed the conviction of Clive Fox, determining there was insufficient evidence to establish his involvement in the operation.
Summary
In a 1985 case, the Utah Supreme Court upheld Gary Fox's conviction for growing and distributing marijuana. However, the court overturned Clive Fox's conviction, stating there was not enough evidence to connect him to the operation.
Summary
In 1985, a court in Utah reviewed a case. Gary Fox was found guilty of growing and selling marijuana, and the court agreed with this decision. However, the court said Clive Fox was not guilty. This was because there was not enough proof that Clive Fox was part of the marijuana operation.