Porter v. Clarke
SimpleOriginal

Summary

In this case, the 4th Circuit held that Virginia’s death-row near-solitary confinement (23–24 hours/day in-cell, minimal social contact) violated the Eighth Amendment because it created a substantial risk of serious psychological harm.

2019 | Federal Juristiction

Porter v. Clarke

Keywords 4th Circuit; Virginia; death-row; near-solitary confinement; solitary confinement; Eighth Amendment; psychological harm; serious psychological harm; minimal social contact; in-cell
Open Case as PDF

Summary

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the near-solitary confinement conditions imposed on individuals on Virginia's death row violated the Eighth Amendment. These conditions involved inmates spending 23 to 24 hours per day in their cells with minimal social interaction. The court's decision stemmed from the finding that such an environment presented a substantial risk of causing severe psychological harm.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals determined that the near-solitary confinement conditions for prisoners on death row in Virginia violated the Eighth Amendment. These conditions involved individuals spending 23 to 24 hours daily inside their cells with very little social interaction. The court's decision was based on the finding that such confinement presented a significant danger of serious psychological harm.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

A federal appeals court, known as the Fourth Circuit, ruled that Virginia's method of holding death-row inmates in near-solitary confinement was against the Eighth Amendment. This form of confinement meant prisoners spent 23 to 24 hours each day in their cells, with very little social interaction. The court decided that this situation posed a significant risk of causing serious psychological harm.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

A court looked at a case about prisoners in Virginia. These prisoners were waiting for death and lived almost completely alone. They stayed in their cells for 23 or 24 hours each day. They had very little contact with other people. The court decided that keeping prisoners alone like this was wrong. It broke a rule in the country's main law, called the Eighth Amendment. This rule says punishments must not be too cruel. The court said this type of living could cause serious harm to a prisoner's mind.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

Porter v. Clarke, 923 F.3d 348 (4th Cir. 2019).

Highlights