People v. Whalum
SimpleOriginal

Summary

In this 2020 case the court held that Proposition 64 did not alter the felony prohibition on possessing cannabis in prison under Penal Code §4573.8, affirming the denial of appellant’s recall petition.

2020 | State Juristiction

People v. Whalum

Keywords Proposition 64; Penal Code §4573.8; cannabis possession; prison; felony; recall petition; 2020 case; court ruling; appellant; felony prohibition
Open Case as PDF

Case Summary

The 2020 appellate court decision upheld the continued applicability of Penal Code §4573.8, which prohibits felony cannabis possession in prison. The court found that Proposition 64, despite legalizing recreational cannabis, did not supersede this specific penal code provision. Consequently, the court's denial of the appellant's recall petition was affirmed.

Open Case as PDF

Case Summary

The 2020 court ruling affirmed the denial of a recall petition. The court found that Proposition 64 did not change the existing felony offense of cannabis possession within prison, as defined in Penal Code §4573.8.

Open Case as PDF

2020 Court Case on Cannabis in Prison

The 2020 court case centered on Proposition 64, a law legalizing cannabis in California. The court decided that this proposition did not change the existing law making it a felony to possess cannabis in prison. This law is found in Penal Code §4573.8. The court's decision upheld the rejection of the request to overturn the conviction.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

In 2020, a court decided that a California law (Proposition 64) didn't change the rule that having cannabis in prison is still a serious crime. The court agreed with the decision to deny someone's request to overturn their conviction.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

50 Cal.App.5th 1 (2020)

Highlights