Case Summary
The California Court of Appeal reversed and remanded a sentence due to the sentencing judge's failure to adequately consider mitigating factors. Specifically, the court found that the judge did not properly account for the defendant's PTSD and substance use, both demonstrably linked to military service, as mandated by applicable law.
Case Summary
The California Court of Appeal reversed Panozo's sentence due to the sentencing judge's failure to adequately consider mitigating factors. Specifically, the court found the judge did not properly account for Panozo's PTSD and substance use, both demonstrably linked to military service, as mandated by law. The case was remanded for resentencing.
Case Summary
A California appeals court overturned Panozo's sentence. The court found the judge didn't properly consider Panozo's PTSD and substance use issues, both stemming from military service, as the law requires. The case will be resentenced.
Summary
A California court decided that a judge didn't follow the rules when sentencing someone named Panozo. The judge didn't think enough about Panozo's problems from being in the military, like PTSD and substance use. Because of this mistake, the court sent the case back to be sentenced again.