People v. Oneal
SimpleOriginal

Summary

In this California state case, Oneal sought mental health diversion based on schizoaffective disorder and substance use. The trial judge found his crimes were caused by drug use instead of mental illness. The appeals court upheld this.

2021 | State Juristiction

People v. Oneal

Keywords California; mental health diversion; schizoaffective disorder; substance use ; mental illness; appeals court; trial judge; Oneal case; California state case
Open Case as PDF

Case Summary

Oneal's motion for mental health diversion in California state court, predicated on a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder and substance use, was denied by the trial court. The court determined that the defendant's criminal actions were attributable to substance use rather than a diagnosed mental illness. This decision was subsequently affirmed on appeal.

Open Case as PDF

Case Summary

Oneal's request for mental health diversion in California was denied. The trial court determined that his offenses stemmed from substance use, rather than his diagnosed schizoaffective disorder. This decision was subsequently affirmed on appeal.

Open Case as PDF

Case Summary

Oneal, facing criminal charges in California, tried to use a mental health diversion program. He argued his schizoaffective disorder and substance use were to blame for his actions. However, the judge decided his crimes stemmed from drug use, not his mental illness. A higher court agreed with this decision.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

Oneal, in California, tried to get his case dismissed because of mental illness and drug use. The judge said his crimes were because of drug use, rather than his mental health problem. A higher court agreed with the judge.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

64 Cal.App.5th 581 (2021)

Highlights