Case Summary
The California Court of Appeal affirmed the denial of conditional release for Diggs, the defendant in this case. The court's decision was predicated on a finding that Diggs continued to use methamphetamine, both prior to the homicide and during incarceration. This presented an ongoing danger to public safety and was deemed a significant factor contributing to the offense and justifying the continued denial of release.
Case Summary
The California Court of Appeal affirmed the denial of conditional release for Diggs, who had been found not guilty by reason of insanity (NGI) for homicide. The court's decision was based on a determination that Diggs continued to use methamphetamine, both prior to the offense and during incarceration. This indicated an ongoing threat to public safety. Therefore, his release was deemed inappropriate.
California Court Case: Diggs's Conditional Release Denied
A California appeals court refused to release Diggs, who had pleaded not guilty by reason of insanity (NGI). The court's decision cited Diggs's history of methamphetamine use, which contributed to the crime. Because he continued to use meth while incarcerated, the court determined he remained a danger to the public.
Summary
Diggs, who was found not guilty by reason of insanity (NGI) for a murder, wanted to leave a mental hospital. However, the court said no. Because Diggs still used meth and this drug use was linked to the murder, the court thought he was still dangerous. Therefore, he had to stay.