People v. Aquisto
SimpleOriginal

Summary

In this Illinois state case, the appellate court reversed Aquisto’s probation sentence. Despite mental illness and substance use, it found the trial court ignored the violent nature of the offense and failed to justify the sentence.

2022 | State Juristiction

People v. Aquisto

Keywords Illinois; appellate court; probation sentence; Aquisto; mental illness; substance use; violent offense; trial court; sentence justification; reversed
Open Case as PDF

Aquisto Case Reversal

The appellate court in this Illinois case overturned Aquisto's probationary sentence. The court's decision highlighted the trial court's failure to adequately consider the offense's violent nature, despite acknowledging Aquisto's mental health challenges and substance use issues. This omission rendered the sentencing decision unjustifiable.

Open Case as PDF

Aquisto Case Reversal

The appellate court in Illinois overturned Aquisto's probationary sentence. The court's decision cited the trial court's failure to adequately consider the violent nature of the crime, even in light of Aquisto's documented mental illness and substance use issues. The appellate court found the trial court's justification for the lenient sentence insufficient.

Open Case as PDF

Aquisto Case: Appellate Court Reversal

The Illinois appellate court overturned Aquisto's probation. Even considering his mental health issues and substance use, the court determined the trial court wrongly minimized the violent nature of his crime. The appellate court found the trial court's decision lacked sufficient justification.

Open Case as PDF

The Court Case

A court in Illinois changed a decision about Aquisto's punishment. Even though Aquisto had mental health issues and a problem with drugs, the court said the first court didn't pay enough attention to how violent the crime was. The first court didn't give a good reason for the punishment it chose.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

205 N.E.3d 812 (2022)

Highlights