NORTHEAST PATIENTS v. UNITED CANNABIS PATIENTS
SimpleOriginal

Summary

In this 2022 case the First Circuit held Maine’s residency rule for dispensary directors violates the dormant Commerce Clause because it discriminates against interstate cannabis commerce.

2022 | Federal Juristiction

NORTHEAST PATIENTS v. UNITED CANNABIS PATIENTS

Keywords Maine; dormant Commerce Clause; residency requirement; dispensary directors; interstate commerce; cannabis; cannabis commerce; First Circuit; 2022 case; discrimination
Open Case as PDF

Maine's Residency Requirement for Cannabis Dispensary Directors and the Dormant Commerce Clause

The 2022 First Circuit decision invalidated Maine's residency requirement for dispensary directors, finding it to be in violation of the dormant Commerce Clause. The court reasoned that the regulation discriminated against interstate commerce in cannabis.

Open Case as PDF

Maine’s Residency Requirement for Cannabis Dispensary Directors

The 2022 First Circuit ruling found Maine's residency requirement for dispensary directors to be in violation of the dormant Commerce Clause. The court determined that the regulation discriminated against interstate commerce in the cannabis industry.

Open Case as PDF

Maine's Residency Rule and the Commerce Clause

A 2022 court case in the First Circuit found that Maine's rule requiring dispensary directors to be state residents breaks federal law. The court ruled that this rule unfairly disadvantages businesses from other states, violating the principle of free commerce between states (the dormant Commerce Clause).

Open Case as PDF

Summary

In 2022, a court decided that Maine's rule about who can run cannabis stores was unfair. The rule said only people who live in Maine could be in charge. The court said this rule went against fair trade between states, because it made it harder for people from other states to work in Maine's cannabis businesses.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

45 F.4th 542 (2022)

Highlights