Case Summary
The California Supreme Court reversed a ruling terminating a father's parental rights. The court found insufficient evidence of present danger to the child posed by the father's methamphetamine use. Furthermore, the agency responsible for the case failed to demonstrate that continued contact between the father and child would result in serious harm.
Summary
The California Supreme Court overturned the termination of a father's parental rights. The court found insufficient evidence of present danger to the child posed by the father's methamphetamine use. Furthermore, the agency responsible for the case failed to demonstrate that continued contact between the father and child would result in serious harm.
Summary
The California Supreme Court overturned a decision to end a father's parental rights. The court found that his methamphetamine use didn't pose an immediate threat to his child, and the child welfare agency didn't prove that continued contact with the father would seriously harm the child.
Summary
A California court decided a dad could still see his child. The court said the dad's methamphetamine use wasn't a current danger to the child, and the people who wanted to take away his rights didn't prove the child would be seriously hurt if he stayed with his dad.