In re F.C. III
SimpleOriginal

Summary

In this 2010 case, the PA Supreme Court upheld Act 53, allowing parents to petition for involuntary drug treatment of minors, finding its civil, therapeutic process—rooted in medical assessment and review—satisfied due process.

2010 | State Juristiction

In re F.C. III

Keywords involuntary treatment; due process; juvenile drug use; drug treatmemt
Open Case as PDF

Summary

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court's 2010 decision affirmed the constitutionality of Act 53, which permits parental petitions for court-ordered drug treatment of minors. The court determined the act's established procedure, emphasizing medical evaluation and judicial oversight, adequately protects minors' due process rights within a civil therapeutic framework.

Open Case as PDF

Pennsylvania's Act 53 and Involuntary Drug Treatment for Minors

The 2010 Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision upholding Act 53 established the legality of parental petitions for court-ordered involuntary drug treatment of minors. The court's ruling centered on the Act's procedural framework, characterizing it as a civil therapeutic process. This process, the court reasoned, incorporates necessary medical evaluations and judicial oversight, thereby satisfying the constitutional requirements of due process.

Open Case as PDF

2010 Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case on Minor Drug Treatment

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court supported Act 53 in 2010. This act lets parents request that their underage children be forced into drug treatment. The court decided the process was fair because it involved medical evaluations and reviews.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

In 2010, Pennsylvania's highest court said it was okay for parents to ask a judge to make their kids get help for drug problems. The court decided that the law, called Act 53, was fair because it involved doctors and made sure kids' rights were protected.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

2 A.3d 1201 (2010) 607 Pa. 45

Highlights