Howard v. Coonrod
SummaryOriginal

Summary

Four juvenile offenders serving life sentences in Florida sued the parole commission arguing the system unfairly denies them a meaningful chance at parole, violating their Eighth Amendment rights.

2021 | State Juristiction

Howard v. Coonrod

Keywords Eighth Amendment; new sentencing procedures; cruel and unusual punishment; meaningful opportunity for release; juvenile offender

Abstract

Robert Earl Howard, Damon Peterson, Carl Tracy Brown, and Willie Watts (plaintiffs) filed a class-action lawsuit against the Florida Commission on Offender Review (FCOR) challenging the state's parole system for juvenile offenders sentenced to life in prison. The plaintiffs argued that the FCOR's practices violated the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment by making it nearly impossible for them to be released on parole, despite being sentenced to life with the possibility of parole. They claimed the FCOR failed to consider their maturity and rehabilitation since the crimes were committed as minors.

Open Case as PDF

Abstract

Robert Earl Howard, Damon Peterson, Carl Tracy Brown, and Willie Watts (plaintiffs) filed a class-action lawsuit against the Florida Commission on Offender Review (FCOR) challenging the state's parole system for juvenile offenders sentenced to life in prison. The plaintiffs argued that the FCOR's practices violated the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment by making it nearly impossible for them to be released on parole, despite being sentenced to life with the possibility of parole. They claimed the FCOR failed to consider their maturity and rehabilitation since the crimes were committed as minors.

Robert Earl Howard, Damon Peterson, Carl Tracy Brown, and Willie Watts initiated a class-action lawsuit against the Florida Commission on Offender Review (FCOR), alleging that the state's parole system for juvenile offenders condemned to life imprisonment violates the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. The crux of their argument centers on the assertion that the FCOR's practices effectively render parole unattainable, despite their sentences of life with the possibility of parole. The plaintiffs contend that the FCOR fails to adequately consider the significant factor of their maturation and rehabilitation achieved since the commission of the crimes during their youth.

Open Case as PDF

Abstract

Robert Earl Howard, Damon Peterson, Carl Tracy Brown, and Willie Watts (plaintiffs) filed a class-action lawsuit against the Florida Commission on Offender Review (FCOR) challenging the state's parole system for juvenile offenders sentenced to life in prison. The plaintiffs argued that the FCOR's practices violated the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment by making it nearly impossible for them to be released on parole, despite being sentenced to life with the possibility of parole. They claimed the FCOR failed to consider their maturity and rehabilitation since the crimes were committed as minors.

Robert Earl Howard, Damon Peterson, Carl Tracy Brown, and Willie Watts initiated a class-action lawsuit against the Florida Commission on Offender Review (FCOR), contesting the state's parole system for juvenile offenders serving life sentences. The plaintiffs argue that the FCOR's practices constitute cruel and unusual punishment, violating the Eighth Amendment, by establishing nearly insurmountable barriers to parole despite their sentences including the possibility of release. They contend that the FCOR disregards their rehabilitation and maturation since their crimes, which were committed when the plaintiffs were minors.

Open Case as PDF

Abstract

Robert Earl Howard, Damon Peterson, Carl Tracy Brown, and Willie Watts (plaintiffs) filed a class-action lawsuit against the Florida Commission on Offender Review (FCOR) challenging the state's parole system for juvenile offenders sentenced to life in prison. The plaintiffs argued that the FCOR's practices violated the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment by making it nearly impossible for them to be released on parole, despite being sentenced to life with the possibility of parole. They claimed the FCOR failed to consider their maturity and rehabilitation since the crimes were committed as minors.

Four men, Robert Earl Howard, Damon Peterson, Carl Tracy Brown, and Willie Watts, are part of a class-action lawsuit against the Florida Commission on Offender Review (FCOR). These men are arguing that the state's parole system is unfair to people who, as teenagers, were sentenced to life in prison with the possibility of parole. Because the FCOR makes it almost impossible to get parole, the lawsuit claims their treatment is cruel and unusual punishment, which is forbidden by the Eighth Amendment. The men say the FCOR doesn't properly consider how they've matured and changed for the better since they committed their crimes as juveniles.

Open Case as PDF

Abstract

Robert Earl Howard, Damon Peterson, Carl Tracy Brown, and Willie Watts (plaintiffs) filed a class-action lawsuit against the Florida Commission on Offender Review (FCOR) challenging the state's parole system for juvenile offenders sentenced to life in prison. The plaintiffs argued that the FCOR's practices violated the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment by making it nearly impossible for them to be released on parole, despite being sentenced to life with the possibility of parole. They claimed the FCOR failed to consider their maturity and rehabilitation since the crimes were committed as minors.

Robert Earl Howard, Damon Peterson, Carl Tracy Brown, and Willie Watts are part of a group of people who are suing the Florida Commission on Offender Review (FCOR), who are in charge of deciding who gets to leave prison in Florida. These men say it's almost impossible to be let out of prison, even though they were told they might be able to leave someday. Even though they were just teenagers when they went to prison, the men say FCOR doesn't think about how they've grown up and become better people. They say that keeping them in prison without considering these things is unfair and wrong.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

Howard v. Coonrod, No. 6:21-cv-00062 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 8, 2021)

Highlights