Summary
In a 2019 decision, the Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed the convictions of Hopkins for aggravated assault and battery, driving under the influence of a controlled substance, and the unlawful use of a toxic substance. A challenge regarding the element of mens rea was rejected.
Summary
In a 2019 case, the Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed Hopkins' convictions for aggravated assault and battery, driving under the influence of a controlled substance, and unlawful use of a toxic substance, rejecting his argument regarding criminal intent.
Summary
In 2019, the Wyoming Supreme Court upheld the convictions of a person named Hopkins. The convictions were for serious charges: aggravated assault and battery, driving under the influence of a controlled substance, and the illegal use of a toxic substance. Hopkins had challenged these convictions by arguing that he did not have the necessary criminal intent for the crimes. However, the court rejected this argument and affirmed the original verdicts.
Summary
In 2019, the highest court in Wyoming looked at Mr. Hopkins' case. The court agreed that Mr. Hopkins was guilty of serious assault, driving under the influence of drugs, and wrongly using a harmful substance. Mr. Hopkins said he did not have the right state of mind when these things happened, but the court did not agree with his argument.