Harris v. Thigpen
SimpleOriginal

Summary

In this 1991 case, the Eleventh Circuit found Alabama’s HIV segregation didn’t violate rights and reaffirmed that substandard or negligent medical care must show systemic deliberate indifference to breach Eighth Amendment standards.

1991 | Federal Juristiction

Harris v. Thigpen

Keywords Eleventh Circuit; Alabama; HIV segregation; Eighth Amendment; medical care; deliberate indifference; systemic; 1991 case; negligent medical care; prisoner rights
Open Case as PDF

The Eleventh Circuit's 1991 Decision on Alabama's HIV Segregation Policy

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals' 1991 ruling addressed the constitutionality of Alabama's policy of segregating individuals with HIV. The court determined that the segregation policy, in itself, did not constitute a violation of constitutional rights. Furthermore, the court reiterated the established precedent that a claim of substandard or negligent medical care, in the context of the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment, necessitates a demonstration of systemic and deliberate indifference on the part of the responsible authorities. This decision highlights the stringent standard required to prove a violation of constitutional rights in cases involving allegations of inadequate medical care within the correctional system.

Open Case as PDF

Alabama's HIV Segregation and the Eighth Amendment

The Eleventh Circuit's 1991 decision regarding Alabama's segregation of HIV-positive inmates clarified the standards for Eighth Amendment violations in the context of medical care. The court held that the state's policy did not constitute cruel and unusual punishment. This ruling emphasized that a finding of deliberate indifference, requiring a showing of systemic negligence rather than isolated instances of substandard care, is necessary to establish an Eighth Amendment violation in cases involving medical treatment.

Open Case as PDF

Alabama's HIV Segregation Case (1991)

A 1991 court case in the Eleventh Circuit ruled that Alabama's policy of isolating people with HIV did not violate their constitutional rights. The court confirmed that to violate the Eighth Amendment (which protects against cruel and unusual punishment), prison medical care must be not just bad or careless, but must show a deliberate and widespread disregard for the health of the inmates.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

In 1991, a court in Alabama decided that keeping people with HIV separate didn't break any laws. The court said that to violate someone's rights, the medical care had to be consistently and intentionally bad, not just a little careless.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

941 F.2d 1495 (1991)

Highlights