Chamberlain v. Virginia Department of Corrections
SimpleOriginal

Summary

In this federal case, an incarcerated man with opioid use disorder sought a preliminary injunction to access methadone or buprenorphine. The court denied relief, finding he failed to show irreparable harm or medical necessity for MAT.

2020 | Federal Juristiction

Chamberlain v. Virginia Department of Corrections

Keywords Methadone; buprenorphine; opioid use disorder; MAT (Medication-Assisted Treatment); incarcerated; preliminary injunction; irreparable harm; medical necessity; federal case; court ruling
Open Case as PDF

Case Summary

This federal action involved a motion for preliminary injunction filed by an incarcerated individual diagnosed with opioid use disorder (OUD). The plaintiff sought court intervention to mandate access to medication-assisted treatment (MAT), specifically methadone or buprenorphine. The court's decision denied the requested relief, concluding the plaintiff had not sufficiently demonstrated irreparable harm or the requisite medical necessity to justify the extraordinary remedy of a preliminary injunction in this context.

Open Case as PDF

Case Summary

This federal case involved a prisoner with opioid use disorder (OUD) who petitioned the court for a preliminary injunction to receive medication-assisted treatment (MAT) with methadone or buprenorphine. The court's denial of the injunction stemmed from the petitioner's failure to demonstrate irreparable harm or the medical necessity of MAT in this specific context.

Open Case as PDF

Case Summary

A prisoner with opioid addiction tried to get a court order to receive methadone or buprenorphine, medications that help manage opioid use disorder. The judge refused, saying the prisoner hadn't proven that not getting the medication would cause serious and irreversible harm, or that the medication was absolutely necessary for his health.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

A man in prison who needed help with opioid addiction asked a judge to let him get medicine to treat it. The judge denied this request because the man did not prove that he would be seriously hurt without the medicine, or that the medicine was absolutely necessary.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

No. 7:20-CV-00045, 2020 WL 5778793 (W.D. Va. Sept. 28, 2020)

Highlights