Brown v. Jordan
SummaryOriginal

Summary

Cyntoia Brown, convicted of murder at 16, challenged Tennessee's life sentence for juveniles. Supreme Court ruled Brown became eligible for parole after 51 years.

2018 | State Juristiction

Brown v. Jordan

Keywords transfer to criminal court; first-degree murder; felony murder; aggravated robbery; post-conviction relief

Abstract

Cyntoia Brown v. Carolyn Jordan (2018) centered on the question of parole eligibility for Cyntoia Brown, who was tried and convicted as an adult for the murder she committed at 16. The Tennessee Supreme Court addressed a certified question from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, determining the minimum sentence for someone convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison under specific Tennessee code sections. The Court ruled that such a defendant would be eligible for release after 51 years.

Open Case as PDF

Abstract

Cyntoia Brown v. Carolyn Jordan (2018) centered on the question of parole eligibility for Cyntoia Brown, who was tried and convicted as an adult for the murder she committed at 16. The Tennessee Supreme Court addressed a certified question from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, determining the minimum sentence for someone convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison under specific Tennessee code sections. The Court ruled that such a defendant would be eligible for release after 51 years.

The case of Cyntoia Brown v. Carolyn Jordan (2018) brought before the Tennessee Supreme Court a certified question from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals concerning the minimum sentence served before parole eligibility in specific circumstances. The case revolved around Cyntoia Brown, who, at age 16, was tried as an adult and convicted of first-degree murder. Subsequently, she received a life sentence. The Court was tasked with interpreting Tennessee law to clarify the minimum sentence duration, thereby determining parole eligibility, for individuals convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment under the specific code sections relevant to Brown's case. The Court ultimately ruled that, per the relevant statutory interpretation, such an individual would become eligible for parole after serving a minimum of 51 years.

Open Case as PDF

Abstract

Cyntoia Brown v. Carolyn Jordan (2018) centered on the question of parole eligibility for Cyntoia Brown, who was tried and convicted as an adult for the murder she committed at 16. The Tennessee Supreme Court addressed a certified question from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, determining the minimum sentence for someone convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison under specific Tennessee code sections. The Court ruled that such a defendant would be eligible for release after 51 years.

The case of Cyntoia Brown v. Carolyn Jordan (2018) revolved around the possibility of parole for Cyntoia Brown, who, at age 16, was tried as an adult and subsequently convicted of murder. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals submitted a certified question to the Tennessee Supreme Court, seeking clarification on the minimum sentence an individual would serve before becoming eligible for parole if they were convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life imprisonment under specific sections of Tennessee law. The Court's ruling determined that such an individual would be eligible for release after serving a minimum of 51 years.

Open Case as PDF

Abstract

Cyntoia Brown v. Carolyn Jordan (2018) centered on the question of parole eligibility for Cyntoia Brown, who was tried and convicted as an adult for the murder she committed at 16. The Tennessee Supreme Court addressed a certified question from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, determining the minimum sentence for someone convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison under specific Tennessee code sections. The Court ruled that such a defendant would be eligible for release after 51 years.

In 2018, a big legal question went all the way to the Tennessee Supreme Court. It had to do with Cyntoia Brown, a woman who was convicted of murder for a crime she committed when she was only 16 years old. The question was about parole, which means being released from prison early for good behavior.

Here's the situation: Cyntoia was found guilty of first-degree murder and given a life sentence. But there are rules in Tennessee (written in their legal codes) that say how long someone has to be in prison before they can ask to be let out on parole. The courts had to decide exactly how those rules applied to Cyntoia's case.

The Tennessee Supreme Court's answer? Someone in Cyntoia's position, convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life, could be eligible for parole after spending 51 years in prison.

Open Case as PDF

Abstract

Cyntoia Brown v. Carolyn Jordan (2018) centered on the question of parole eligibility for Cyntoia Brown, who was tried and convicted as an adult for the murder she committed at 16. The Tennessee Supreme Court addressed a certified question from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, determining the minimum sentence for someone convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison under specific Tennessee code sections. The Court ruled that such a defendant would be eligible for release after 51 years.

In 2018, the courts looked at the case of Cyntoia Brown, who was found guilty of murder when she was 16 years old and given a life sentence. The big question was when she could be eligible for parole (a chance to be released from prison early). The highest court in Tennessee had to decide how long someone convicted of this crime had to stay in prison before they could ask to be let out. They looked at specific laws in Tennessee and said that someone in Cyntoia's situation would have to spend at least 51 years in prison before becoming eligible for parole.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

Brown v. Jordan, 563 S.W.3d 196 (Tenn. 2018)

Highlights