Case Summary
The 2021 federal court reversal of Dingwall's conviction stemmed from the exclusion of expert testimony on trauma and duress, deemed crucial given the central role of her partner's crack cocaine use. Subsequently, the court mandated a new trial.
Case Summary
The 2021 federal reversal of Dingwall's conviction highlighted the significant role of her partner's crack cocaine use. The court found that the exclusion of expert testimony on trauma and duress constituted reversible error. Consequently, a new trial was mandated.
2021 Federal Case Reversal
A federal court overturned Dingwall's conviction in 2021. The case hinged on her partner's crack cocaine addiction and use. Crucially, the court found that Dingwall had been unfairly prevented from using expert testimony about trauma and coercion. This led to the order for a new trial.
The Case of Ms. Dingwall
A court decided in 2021 that Ms. Dingwall didn't deserve to be found guilty. The court said that the judge made a mistake. They didn't let Ms. Dingwall explain how her partner's drug problem and mistreatment affected her actions. Because of this mistake, Ms. Dingwall will have a new trial.